Hello, Paradisetoshutdown, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 03:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pages i work Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 02:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full list of creations

Hello, Paradisetoshutdown,

Thank you for creating 2025 Electronic Dance Music Awards.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You should be using reliable and independent sources about the subject. Not primary sources, which are sources written by the subject themselves. A primary source could be a source written by the company, person etc. that the article is about. An independent source is one that is NOT written, endorsed or paid by the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sebbog13}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sebbog13 (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebbog13: Thank you, as soon there's more independent sources i will added them! x ~~~~ Paradisetoshutdown Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Paradisetoshutdown, just so you know, I removed the Gold Derby awards from List of awards and nominations received by Maren Morris because it's not considered a notable award. The music award that the site gives out is very new, and isn't covered by any independent, reliable sources. Perhaps one day it will be more notable, but it hasn't achieved that yet. Thank you for your work! Alyo (chat·edits) 15:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Paradisetoshutdown, I reverted your last edit on the Anyma page, for a couple of reasons:

1. Along with adding new content (music videos), you also undid all the edits I had done prior, without bothering to provide a reason. This is sneaky and rude, so please don't do it again.
2. The table was missing all kinds of correct markup for the videos you added, such as quotation marks around song titles. Please make sure that your edits aren't sloppy, as that simply creates more work for other editors who have to fix your errors. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Revirvlkodlaku, sorry for not asking beforehand, i honestly thought the page was dead, as there's a lot of information that needs to be updated, thanks for the feedback, please know there was not bad intentions behind it. I really wanted to added the new content, but again my apologies. sending love xx Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Paradisetoshutdown, no worries, and thanks for explaining. I'm not sure what you mean by "dead", and you are welcome to add new content, just please make sure you are not undoing the work of other editors for no good reason, and as much as possible, please do your best to follow the Manual of Style. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paradisetoshutdown. Thank you for your work on Nu Aspect. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Blood (Ellie Goulding song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Blood (Ellie Goulding song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LoTrWiki (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Church of the Outlaws. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because WP:Articles for deletion/Church of the Outlaws. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Left guide (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So... the WiFi at my campus appears to be quite awful, which is why I don't have time to give an expanded explanation to your question you asked me, but two days ago, you left a message asking me about why I tagged the article for having a fan POV and sources not verifying the content. I'll just point out some notable examples:

• The article is super defensive of her, mainly with the allegations of her personal life. The first sentence of the "Public image" section, for example, is "Goulding's personal life has been highly subject of intense media scrutiny, as well a victim of constant false rumours spread by British tabloids, which has affected her public image and her mental health" (and by the way, claims about the "false" allegations are also mentioned in the lead section), sourced by this BBC article, which falls under both issues. Not only is it something a defensive fan would say, but the article itself makes no mention of it - it only mentions the radio DJ being subject to claims by those tabloids (not even specified as a British one, by the way).
• Another example of a claim with the same problems is this OK Magazine article that is sourced for that she was "slut-shame[d]".
• It's a problem in the "Artistry" section as well, such as the mention that "[Goulding] is noted for her high piercing vibrato, breathy tone and emotive delivery" sourced by two sources that have the same issue; they do not verify the content and are original research.
• The Celebs Now article (which, by the way, is now deleted; I could only find it through Wayback Machine) says that they split in 2012 after 18 months, but where's the source that they started in 2010? (I suppose that's what "[they dated] in 2010" means, but that is poor grammar and can be misleading to some just to side note).
• Then there's the "Fake Showbiz" article by The Face. I am not personally familiar with "Fake Showbiz News" or the situation, but the prose claims that Goulding "keeps a low profile on social media" with that source, but that is not mentioned in the Face article.
• There are also a bunch of needless tweets in the list of artists who have spoken favourably about her, which is not what Wikipedia is for - save them for Fandom or TV Tropes; stuff like this is bloating the article with unnecessary information and fancruft (plus, I really do not think we need that whole list anyway; the paragraph below is enough).

Anyway, that's a list of examples I'll give for now. There are probably others, but I suggest re-reading the article and with the information I pointed out, I recommend rewriting some of it to be more neutral and also to re-check the sources to make sure all of them are verifying what is written (and also I suggest removing some stuff that can't be found anywhere other than Twitter or Instagram, as is some of the stuff; that stuff, again, should be on Fandom or TV Tropes, not Wikipedia). If there is enough, the article will probably be able to move up to B-class, which is something we can only hope to see in articles that have over 8,000 words (although per WP:Article Size#Size guideline, it might be time to trim out some of it or move some stuff to another sub-article). Anyway, have a nice day! LoTrWiki (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LoTrWiki Hi! thanks i will check those things! and re-write them or change sources.. Have a nice day you too!

Updates: So far, i added articles and interviews for the "media scrutiny" sentence, where has been actually discussed/mentioned. i changed the Fake Showbiz prose to "During the 2020s" which is more neutral and the sources date are from different years of this decade (22-23-24). As soon as i have more time (i'm also in the UNI), i will revist the others, i would appreciate your feedback in the updates!

Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also forgot to mention, there are various grammar errors, although most are minor so not the biggest priority, but still worth noting for improving the article. LoTrWiki (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! @LoTrWiki i will keep an eye on that too!, about the six points you mentioned early, i have been lucky to find better sources where those claims (point 1, and 2) are actually mentioned, also point five has been corrected!. About point 3, i think whoever wrote that sentence, was paraphrasing those remarks, maybe instead of looking for a better sources, we should maybe paraphrased better, like highlighting that it came from music critics. i would appreciate hearing your opinion on that. Have a nice day! Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perimenopop, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cassette and Vinyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradisetoshutdown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Otra Era, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:05, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Livelikemusic Hi! Can you point which styles in particular were unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand?, it would be very helpful if you can offer more explicit detailes. Thanks x Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 02:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ping me in responses, thank you. And all Manual of Styles were noted in my edit summary—MOS:DATEFORMAT, MOS:NUM, MOS:OVERLINK (as well as WP:CITEVAR and WP:CITEVARYES). livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I just saw them. thanks. Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 02:17, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Locket (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dreamsicle deluxe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paradisetoshutdown, I saw your edits on Draft:Destiny (Ellie Goulding song), and wanna introduce three things to you:

1. Please see WP:A/S. The most sources you added are genereally unreliable. For example, PM Studio is regarded as an unreliable source.

2. You'd better see MOS:CURLY. In Wikipedia, “” or ‘’ should NOT be used, but " " or ' ' should be used instead.

3. Per Template:Refname rules, <ref name=":0"> is not recommended. Please name references properly if you can. Thank you! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 07:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! thanks for reaching out to me! i will be checking this out, thank u! <3 Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also! i think its ready to be published now! if you want to give it a look. thanks! x Paradisetoshutdown (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw the article you recently made, and it was improved a lot more than your past articles, but I want to introduce some Manual of Styles that might help you at improving the article qualities:

• MOS:HEADER & MOS:TABLECAPTION: they might help you when you add headers using |+.
• MOS:LEADCITE: you dont have to cite sources in lead section
• MOS:TITLECAPS & MOS:CONFORMTITLE

These policies should be followed in most of articles. Thank you for your contribs! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 15:03, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cam Boy, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Emotion Picturesadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradisetoshutdown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mustang (EP), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to X-Rated: NYC has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from your sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where Did All the Love Go? (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where Did All the Love Go? (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Where Did All the Love Go by ZZ Ward.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paradisetoshutdown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Church of the Outlaws, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]