KhantWiki (talk) 10:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Media Monitoring Team (Myanmar) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vestrian24Bio was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Media Monitoring Team (Myanmar) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vestrian24Bio 03:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fermiboson was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Treating this as WP:NORG instead of WP:NPLACE because it’s more about the museum and its contents than the building itself. Source 6 seems potentially usable, but all the rest are primary. Topic is potentially notable but needs better sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defence Services Museum (Myanmar) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fermiboson (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Myanmar Military Engineering Corps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fermiboson (talk) 01:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still reads like AI- there are unsourced sections and sections that seem unnecessary and essay-like. I would suggest looking at the Judiciary section in Politics of Myanmar and expanding that instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judiciary of Myanmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 20:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. For instance as in Myanmar Military Engineering Corps- you have several several several sources that were irrelevant to the content. You also used several sources about the Vietnamese Engineering Corps or the Thai one or the Indian one to support things about Myanmar. I think it's pretty clear that you did not read or even open the links to many of the sources you used. The content that you used is still very unprofessional and extremely obviously from AI chatbots with lists of vague things. You didn't add many of the actually relevant and important information from your sources. In the History section you cited sources that didn't talk about history and in the Training section you cited sources that talked about history! Most of your text just repeats the same vague statements that was already covered and you failed to tag the sources properly. I know that you know what Burmese language looks like- if you opened the links you claim to have read it would be obvious that the source is not in English like you tagged them as. If you continue to lazily write articles without reading, I will have to take further action. I would prefer not to as Myanmar articles need more editors as it is- but it's very time consuming and frustrating to have to babysit and check everything you do when you do not seem to understand or fix these problems. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 21:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with @EmeraldRange — it’s very time-consuming and frustrating to have to babysit and check everything you do when you do not seem to understand or fix these problems.

Exactly this. I am completely tired of him. I explained things to him again and again. Every time, he promised to be courteous, pretended to understand Wikipedia policies, and acted as if he got everything I explained.

In reality, he doesn’t even understand the most basic Wikipedia policies. I can’t tolerate this anymore. If I’m not wrong, I explained things to him more than 20 times just to help polish a new Burmese editor, and my time was totally wasted. As his guide, I can no longer defend him.

He even told me that he graduated from two Eng private schools in Yangon and claimed he is proficient in all four English skills at a professional level. Honestly, I strongly doubt this self-claim...his English on Wikipedia is clearly at a very basic level.

Anyway, if he continues using AI to write like this, I fully support @EmeraldRange and @Htanaungg in taking further action, no matter what. This situation is extremely frustrating and exhausting. Hteiktinhein (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EmeraldRange Sure, don’t explain too much, it’s a waste of time. He will not understand what you explained above. Instead, he just puts everything you say into ChatGPT, like, “Hey… GPT, how should I reply to this comment?”, and then posts that here.

As we can see, his machine-generated comments are really hard to understand. In the past, I tolerated this many times and pretended to be blind and not see it. Now, I honestly feel this machine-generated behavior has become a burden. Hteiktinhein (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myanmar Military Engineering Corps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myanmar Military Engineering Corps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Htanaungg (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Htanaungg was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

(Setting aside whether the sources are reliable or not) even a quick review shows that you have cited items that do not support the claims they are attached to. For example, you cite a One News Myanmar piece for the date of establishment, but that date is not mentioned in the article. Likewise, the MOI link you cite for its formation does not contain those facts either—it only reports a meeting between Min Aung Hlaing and the Roscosmos Director General. These two examples alone make the referencing questionable, and your editing history suggests that you may be relying on LLM output without even checking the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Myanmar Space Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Htanaungg (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ko Pauk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 10:08, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ko Pauk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:26, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EmeraldRange. KhantWiki (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on Myanmar-related articles. Yue🌙 (talk) 02:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your cookie and support, Yue! Much appreciated and many more great contributions are coming along the year. KhantWiki (talk) 02:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking you for your participation in the November 2025 Article Improvement Drive Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:28, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nur al-Idah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello KhantWiki, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a prosperous Happy New Year 2026, Abishe. I'm genuinely so happy by reading this message and how warm and heart whelming it is to me. May you and your family be surrounded by love, peace, success and happiness as well.. Thank you so much for your kindness and for your welcoming and sincere greetings message. 🎄🎆 KhantWiki (talk) 22:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shengjia Zhao, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello KhantWiki, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Arupkumarsaha0 (talk) 06:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Arupkumarsaha0 (talk) 06:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Wishing you and your family a prosperous Happy New Year 2026. May you all be healthy, strong, and blessed with undisputable success in life. KhantWiki (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXVI Lunar Calendar

KhantWiki,
Have a great 2026 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2026 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2026}} to user talk pages.

– CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your sincere heartfelt warming and beautiful greetings message. Happy New Year 2026 to you and your family. May you all be blessed with health, happiness, strength and persistence in life to overcome everything once and for all. Much Love and respect. KhantWiki (talk) 00:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my dearest friend. Wishing you and your family a blessed and prosperous Happy New Year 2026.🎆 May you and your family be healthy, strong and wealthy. Hope you all are doing well and safe. Sending you love and respect. KhantWiki (talk) 00:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Phyo Gyi".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KhantWiki. Thank you for your work on Min Shwe Kyu. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated, have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 15:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wishing you a blessed day and may your days be filled with peace and blessings.. KhantWiki (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to 1976 Burmese coup attempt when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:15, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing it, I will look forward to learn from this, sometimes parameters variable template does not show or even exist.. Your recommendation is really helpful and it will save lot with my editing skills. Unknown parameters on Wikipedia should be treated with great care and thank you for solving this minor issue.. I will take note of this next time to get a hold of the infobox templates.. KhantWiki (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myanmar Space Agency, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that plans for Myanmar's space programme began under an elected civilian government in 2017, but the Myanmar Space Agency was ultimately formed in 2025 under military rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myanmar Space Agency. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Myanmar Space Agency), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind message. KhantWiki (talk) 00:17, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

see WP:NBIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marwi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nur al-Idah".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhantWiki. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shengjia Zhao".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Moe Kyaw Thu. Thanks! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Agree with the other user that this seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E- seems to mostly be notable for surrender and subsequent punishment after Laukkai

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moe Kyaw Thu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 02:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review EmeraldRange, that means the article is notable with only one event without significant coverage. The event is notable. KhantWiki (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Battle of Laukkai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SnowyRiver28 were:

This article falls under the scope of the BLP: Subjects notable only for one event guideline. Because the subject is not notable outside of their death, they likely do not qualify for their own distinct article. Instead, this article should be merged into Death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nurul Amin Shah Alam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Marwi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Htanaungg (talk) 05:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the Marwi article, Htanaungg. It took quite a while, but it is worth it with the acceptance quality. More high quality contributions will come by me by this year. KhantWiki (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]