User talk:Historyday01

CAN'T RETIRE
Historyday01 tried to leave Wikipedia, but found that they couldn't do so…

After some thought, and considering full or semi-retirement, per what is stated at WP:RETIRE, possibly by December 31, 2025 as I noted in previous messages on here on 4/14/25 and 8/28/25, I have decided to drop that at this point. I may reconsider it in 2026, depending on what happens.--Historyday01 (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user has created 68 articles on Wikipedia.



Hello! Feel free to post comments, suggestions, and whatnot, and I'll do my best to respond to them in a timely manner. Please do not ever invite me to participate in AfD discussions or those on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard (RSN), either by posting on this talk page or pinging me. If you do so, I politely decline to participate in such discussions. Engaging in such discussions is emotionally and mentally draining. I do not wish to be pulled into those discussions. Thanks.--Historyday01 (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder about talk page guidelines

WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS and WP:INTERLEAVE state:

Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page...Generally, you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving or interpolating your own replies to individual points. This causes confusion with who said what and obscures the original editor's intent.

WP:TALKOFFTOPIC, which lists examples of appropriately editing others' comments (italics is my emphasis):

Personal talk page cleanup...Removing prohibited material such as libel; legal threats; personal details; content that is illegal under US law; or violations of copyright, living persons, or anti-promotional policies...Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling, and vandalism. This generally does not extend to messages that are merely uncivil; deletions of simple invective are controversial. Posts that may be considered disruptive in various ways are another borderline case and are usually best left as-is or archived...Your idea of what is off topic may differ from what others think is off topic, so be sure to err on the side of caution

WP:TALK#REPLIED states (italics is my emphasis):

So long as no one has yet responded to your comment, it's accepted and common practice that you may continue to edit your remarks for a short while to correct mistakes, add links or otherwise improve them. If you've accidentally posted to the wrong page or section or if you've simply changed your mind, it's been only a short while and no one has yet responded, you may remove your comment entirely. But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes...To add an explanation of your change, you may add a new comment directly below your original or elsewhere in discussion as may be most appropriate; insert a comment in square brackets.

WP:OWNTALK states:

User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively. The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion. Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving.

WP:BLANKING states:

Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. If a user removes material from their talk page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents; this is true whether the removal was manual or automatic. There is no need to keep them on display, and usually users should not be forced to do so.

Current draft pages:

Currently watching:

Current drafts in progress:

Current blank pages:

Keeping a watch on and updating view counts every so often:

Helluva Boss and Hazbin Hotel are usually updated pretty frequently so I'm not going to worry about those.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radford Sechrist (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Youtube, Instagram, X and similar self created sources with lack of managerial and editorial overview need to be removed. This is (now?) WP:BOMBARD. It requires substantial pruning of the excess, and a précis of the prose
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. I resubmitted it again. Hopefully better results this time. Historyday01 (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Historyday01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 14:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Historyday01, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 11:13, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 11:13, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for such a nice message. I don't celebrate Christmas, but I did open some gifts. I guess it was a nice "Atheist Gift-Giving Day" (as some call it). Historyday01 (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Historyday01. Hello! Did you have a good New Year 2026? We look forward to your contributions to Wikipedia! Thank you! (Iluziya7 (talk) 05:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC))[reply]
Yeah I did have a good New Year 2026. Historyday01 (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Historyday01. Very good, excellent 👍 Happy 2026! (Iluziya7 (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC))[reply]
@Historyday01. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! (Iluziya7 (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC))[reply]
It's my pleasure. Historyday01 (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Historyday01. Okey, thanks! (Iluziya7 (talk) 13:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC))[reply]

New Year's 2026

@Historyday01! Happy New Year! Wishing you a year filled with knowledge, collaboration, and meaningful contributions. Thank you for your dedication to building free, reliable, and accessible knowledge for everyone around the world. May the new year bring you inspiration, successful edits, respectful discussions, and strong community spirit. Here’s to another year of improving Wikipedia together! Warm regards, — A fellow Wikipedian, Thanks! Happy birthday editing! (Iluziya7 (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for such a kind message. I hope to make many great contributions on here this year. Historyday01 (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Good, happy editing! (Iluziya7 (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC))[reply]

I noticed your contribution on Draft:Radford Sechrist

Hello historyday01 thanks for contribution on Radford Sechrist like Adding new soruces for independent and new eassy btw I'm. Not involved in socketpuppet. JamesLatts (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it's my pleasure Historyday01 (talk) 13:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thank you for your contribution on Draftspaces

JamesLatts (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. Historyday01 (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radford Sechrist (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 23:00, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radford Sechrist has been accepted

Radford Sechrist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 23:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I really appreciate it! Historyday01 (talk) 23:53, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

LGBTQ representation on Magical Girl Friendship Squad: Origins

Most of my changes to the article were typical grammar changes, but I shortened this section to remove the following: Six episodes of the adult animation, inspired by Sailor Moon and other magical girl anime, began airing on Syfy,[1][2] features two women, Alex and Daisy.

This information is not important to the LGBTQ representation and can already be found earlier in the article. I just cut it straight to the facts that Daisy sleeps with a woman in the second episode. I cut both of the citations since neither of the sources metion anything about her lesbianism. MezmerizingWiseguy (talk) 22:58, 27 January 2026 (UTC) MezmerizingWiseguy (talk) 22:58, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I thought your recent edit was generally fine, but the other one was done without explaining why content was removed. I don't know how I was supposed to assess an edit when there's no explanation as to why it's done. Your edit actually did make sense, and I implemented it here, but those sources didn't need to be cut, they just needed to be moved to the right section.--Historyday01 (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 1 § Trans gay until a consensus is reached. Abesca (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology

I had a talk with user:BradyBunchFan on the live help chat (on IRC). They were unaware of WP:ABOUTSELF as an exception to the general ban on social media as a source (as I often say, "Wikipedia is very big and nobody can know all of it"), and I hope that you can understand that they meant well. As well, I would point out that terms like "renegade" can be hurtful. DS (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just a bit frustrated. I won't use that term again. I am hoping for a better source, honestly. Ettarh apparently has an obituary but... the link to it doesn't come up with anything and the best I could find with an alternate source was this, as links like this clam she cannot be found (and no one archived the obituary either). Considering how prominent she was in the community of librarians, I imagine that someone else will write a tribute/obituary in the coming days. Historyday01 (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Just came upon your talk page as I was about to edit a colleague's page - I just want to thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia over the years - you are amazing! Cmh32 (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for saying that. I really appreciate it. Historyday01 (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic Princess Kaguya!

Hey! I don't know if this is yuri or not, but someone added this to the yuri anime list with Anilist as the source (apparently due to user tags). Please check it out! Delete it if it's an OR, or change the source if it's actually yuri. The Japanese wiki article lists its as yuri based on the source, but it's a review within a secondary source, so I don't really know. Solaire the knight (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I'll look into it. I've watched most of the film myself but then got sidetracked with watching other series. Historyday01 (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Judging by the English-language article, this is indeed yuri, one way or another, but I'm temporarily unable to edit the article space. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Two-spirit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Two-spirit, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A typographic error. I'll fix it. Historyday01 (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Petski, Diane (May 13, 2020). "'Magical Girl Friendship Squad': Quinta Brunson & Anna Akana Lead Ensemble Cast Of Syfy's TZGZ Anime-Inspired Comedy". Deadline. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  2. ^ Milligan, Mercedes (May 13, 2020). "SYFY Greenlights 'Devil May Care', 3 More Pilots for Adult Toon Block TZGZ". Animation Magazine. Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Historyday01