Hi Eggs012! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suzette Charles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kaya Comer-Schwartz. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Robert Paxton (United States Senate). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the current source(s) are referencing google document(s) which are primary, and may not be reliable. Please add reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (e.g news coverage). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mary Suit Jones. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the current source(s) are referencing google document(s) which are primary, and may not be reliable. Please add reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (e.g news coverage). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eggs012, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jeffrey Roth (Government official), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Roth (Government official).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you either removed an Articles for deletion notice from an article, Jeffrey Roth (Government official), or removed another person's comment(s) in an Articles for deletion debate. Removing AfD templates or editing others comments might make it difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment on the AfD discussion instead. Thank you. Emily.Owl (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Meamemg. I noticed that you recently made an edit to United States District Court for the District of Arizona in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You seem to repeatedly say that you are "citing reliable source" in your edit summary. However, a review of your edits does not show you adding sources or having a source on those pages. meamemg (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nick E. Smith, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Deputy Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Michelle H. Reinshuttle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Lisa Grant, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jody Wright (United States Senate). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article White House Office. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 19:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chatichai Choonhavan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create articles based on someone's position. WP:N takes priority. If there are no reliable sources that can support an article for a person, one should not be created by virtue of positions. Gemini and LinkedIn, which you used at Draft:Caroline Sadlowski are not enough. Desiree Grace may or may not be the U.S. attorney; that information is not known at this time and any "analysis" from AI should not be used until reliable sources state otherwise. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:42, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The {{cn}} template isn't a formatting error, it's necessary for unclear and unsourced portions of articles to be smoothed out over time via additional research. Arlo James Barnes 01:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Suit Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nick E. Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michelle H. Reinshuttle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lisa Grant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jody Wright (United States Senate), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mary Suit Jones".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jody Wright".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Ahmed Sékou Touré, you may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 09:02, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to General officer, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:35, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 00:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned multiple times -- dating back since at least April of this year, and as recently as twice since this morning -- to stop removing maintenance tags from articles if you have not done the work to address the issue those tags refer to. You are expected to listen to, and abide by the warnings you're given, and to communicate with other editors. If you are unable or unwilling to do so, the next block will be indefinite in duration. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 00:56, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but not supplant, the key facts that appear in an article. Your edits [1] adding non-notable individuals who do not appear in the body text to the infobox is contrary to this. Please stop. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caroline Sadlowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Paxton (United States Senate), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deputy Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Paxton".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggs012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Deputy Clerk of the United States House of Representatives".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]