Template:Civil War and slavery editnotice has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:40, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swastika not Hakenkreuz has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:46, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 January 5 § Category:Pages with Nazi common name editnotice on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a missing ref concerning the Horace Porter quoted material in this article now:

According to Grant's personal secretary, Horace Porter, Lincoln was "exceedingly popular" with the rest of the staff, "was always ready to perform his share of hard work" and "never expected to be treated differently from any other officer" because he was the President's son.</ref>

Thanks - Shearonink (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks for pointing it out. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Rock (abolitionist), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Slavery Society was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flying High (1931 film), a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McGowan was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by another editor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jack Norton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Was this supposed to read "foolish", or did the historian spell it "foolosh"? NE2 03:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, my error. Thanks for the catch. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]