Archives

Archive 1

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on "Ask Me Again" at AFC (h/t the Teahouse). Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Is it appropriate to add to this article that a commenter on IMDb wrote "I keep my old VCR just so I can re-watch this" in 2020? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because it's a wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Artis Henderson. Thanks! Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your help! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Allthemilescombined1, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us along with writers and physicians. You might find it useful to look through our Primer for guidance on women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rayne Rouce. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews, what he says or has written are primary sources so cannot be used to establish notability. The Culture Fix is a weak source because they are a freelance site and there's no named author. The Berliner I would count toward notability but need a couple more reputable sources that have covered him in some depth. S0091 (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel-Ryan Spaulding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In Her World, Getting Cheated On Makes You a ‘Chump’ is mostly based on what she says, Everyone’s Breaking Up, but Nobody’s Bitter: What’s Going On? is a quote as is the Toronto Star and The New Yorker is a brief mention. There's mention of criticism in one of the NYT pieces but those sources are not included and there's only a brief mention in the draft's content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracy Schorn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Beckerman (musicologist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your comment, this is helpful. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel-Ryan Spaulding. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I made the changes. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Beckerman (musicologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rayne Rouce. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the changes. Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

These all look like passing mentions. Can you find anything that has significant biographical coverage, or discusses her puzzles at length?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patti Varol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Bouchier. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I added a couple more reviews - are we there yet? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Allthemilescombined1, I just noticed this now and I don't have time to check - just dropping you a warning that when you reply to these template messages, we usually have no idea you've done that! You have to specifically ping the person you're replying to, since the AfC templates don't automatically subscribe us to the discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Thank you. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

	Women writers
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers

Hello. I responded to a comment you made on WT:WIR and a few other editors pointed out that I might have been somewhat harsh, especially given you were a new editor. I took a look and - you are a new editor, of only three months! And yet - you've done absolutely amazing work in those three months, multiple well written articles, and even getting blocked! (Which may not seem like a desirable achievement, but is certainly an achievement! Especially in surviving it, and continuing to do good work!) Anyway, I would like to show a bit of appreciation for that excellent work, by way of welcome.

• I found and uploaded a free-licensed image for Laura Vanderkam and cropped it; if you believe the uncropped one would be better, please do use that one.

• 
  uncropped
• 
  cropped, in article

• Per your userpage request, I tried to track down Robert Bruce (actor) from "Ask Me Again", but suspect IMDB may have sent me down the wrong rabbit hole. It links "American Playhouse" Ask Me Again (TV Episode 1989) - Full Cast & Crew - IMDb to Robert Bruce - IMDb, who seems to have been Robert Bruce | NZ On Screen. If this is him, he seems to have been an interesting person: Scot, New Zealander, Actor, Wrestler, Agent, Stuntman, Bodyguard ... if there are enough sources to make an article about him, it will be an amazing article. However, that makes me doubtful if this is him, since Nelson Rodker is supposed to be a nerd, right? Would a huge wrestler type have been cast as a nerd?

Anyway, the image is good, hope you like that one, and even more so hope you keep up the great work writing. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban Many thanks for your kind words and all your help. The actor playing Nelson Rodker didn't sound Scottish, though of course that doesn't mean a thing. There must be some podcaster out there who would like to take on this challenge, right? Someone who loves Scrabble... Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Bouchier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rayne Rouce, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enough now. This is a warning to cease and desist with the WP:ASPERSIONS and general unhelpfulness at the Zionism article. Selfstudier (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Allthemilescombined1 -- You asked for feedback at WiR on this; not sure what aspect you are concerned about? Some quick off-the-cuff thoughts... The subject looks notable to me under WP:AUTHOR but you probably could make this more obvious for a reviewer (whether in AfC or NPP) by linking the book reviews more clearly. I'd divide it slightly differently, esp moving hospital executive into the earlier section -- the Career is best focused on the wiki-notable career as an author, not on other aspects. I'd also take hospital exec out of the lead. Generally op eds in newspapers don't contribute (much) to notability, and can put reviewers off a bit. (It's a common promotional gambit to list tonnes of these.) I'd slim these down to a few of the most prominent examples. The word "speaker" is also loaded with promotional overtones for reviewers and you might like to remove this from the lead too. List the books that have multiple reviews in the lead with dates of publication and co-author. Hope this helps! Good luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside you do realise that it's completely ok to just move your creations to mainspace yourself? (Obligatory caveat: As long as you are not being paid to write them.) NPP can be harsh but it's generally a lot quicker than AfC. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And another one... I notice you are the editor who created Carol A. Carter -- I meant to thank the creating edit on that one, but hit the wrong line in the history. Anyway, thanks!, I read it with interest (used to work in the field of HIV). Glad you ignored the unhelpful comment at Teahouse on Carter's notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I think I'm an approval junkie. I want to make sure everything I move to mainspace is up to standards. But also there's an aspect of "look mom, I made this picture! Oh honey, it's so great!" (In Bossypants, Tina Fey makes her first picture in kindergarten, expecting praise like she gets at home, and the boy next to her rips it in half). I'll work on this latest draft with your comments in mind. Side point - you know who else has a beautiful smile, besides Carol A. Carter? Carol Ann Carter! With cool art stuff in the background. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have to run with Silence Equals Approval here or you go mad; there's so much bad content that needs fixing, people often neglect to praise the enormous effort that goes into creating decent content. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And, oh, now I see what you mean on Carol Ann Carter; pity we can't get that image into the article -- I do think bios especially are greatly enhanced by an image but there are so rarely free ones to be had. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Here are recent diffs of your additions that fail WP:DUE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NPOV and WP:RELEVANCE being reverted by various editors: [1], [2], [3], [4] and so on. Instead of addressing these reverts, you have re-added similar content in the same and other articles. Please stop doing this, as it is disruptive editing. If you want a particular piece of content added to a page, and it is challenged, seek consensus for it in talk. You have already been notified about this area being a WP:CTOP, so I won't repeat the earlier warning, but please keep this in mind when editing in future. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I posted two separate requests on the talk page and pinged you. Hearing no response after a couple of days, and with no discussion for several days after my edits, I re-added the content. I would appreciate if you would start a discussion on talk before reverting my edits without any discussion, or ping me so I can discuss with you. I look forward to discussing the material, since we still haven't. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not receive a ping for either of these - I believe a ping only happens after an edit (as seems to have happened on those two talk page threads) if you create a new line (WP:PINGFIX). I'll answer on the talk page, but the tl;dr is that neither piece of information has anything to do with the article, which is not about Palestinian views or antisemitic incidents. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent comment on talk:Gaza genocide is considered a repeated violation of our WP:Notforum policy after this comment on the same talk page. Consider this a formal warning and please restrain yourself from making similar mistake again, particularly on pages related to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Any further violation would be reported to administrators and may result in suspension of your editor privilege on Wikipedia. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I reverted your edit to Sheryl Sandberg. Your edit may very well have been correct, but isn't supported as far as I can see in the article. If you have a reliable source indicating specifically that Sandberg is an activist against antisemitism (as per WP:BLP, WP:NOR, WP:RS), feel free to add back your properly cited claim. --Yamla (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calling on Jewish leaders to unify against the rising tide of antisemitism, she urged them to stand resilient and to take action in combating misinformation and bias within educational institutions and society.^[1] Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article already describes her work producing a documentary of antisemitic sexual crimes. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Producing a documentary would not be sufficient; see WP:NOR. Similarly, the article from jpost doesn't describe her as an activist against anti-semitism, though it would certainly be sufficient to indicate she is concerned about rising antisemitism, stnads against antisemitism, etc. etc. The key point is, we can only claim what is directly supported by reliable sources, not come to our own conclusions about what that means. --Yamla (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allthemilescombined1:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Sachs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Republic and ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This is not an appropriate report for AIV. WP:VANDALISM has a specific training on Wikipedia, and that meaning isn't "has removed content in the past." ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ScottishFinnishRadish, what about WP:DIS? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism only. If you believe there is a chronic, intractable behavioral issue you can bring it to WP:ANI. I can almost guarantee you that in this situation the report would not go the way you would like. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have we interacted in AfDs? I can't recall. LibStar (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yesterday. Since we were on opposite sides, I wanted to understand your philosophy on AfDs, so I went to your user page. Your examples were so funny that I had a good laugh for the first time in quite a while. I still disagree on our issue yesterday, but completely agree on the examples you showed. Many editors work hard on here to little fanfare, and your insightful humor lifted my morale. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allthemilescombined1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patti Varol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle:[1] 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:October H8TE poster.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at my latest comment to you question about this file at WP:MCQ#File:October H8TE poster.jpg. This almost certainly needs to be treated as non-free content unless you're somehow claiming to be the poster's copyright holder or have obtained the copyright holder's WP:CONSENT. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly Thank you for your help and patience. I added Licensing and Non-free use rationale. Please let me know if it needs further improvement. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did some minor cleanup, but it should otherwise be fine. One thing, though, is that the poster you uploaded and the one red one found on the film's official website are different. In many cases, multiple posters are created for a film the production company to enhance the promotion of the file and even possible to increase merchandizing opportunities, but it's better to upload the poster officially used by theaters for Wikipedia's purposes. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy Schorn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GeoColdWater. Thank you.

You're being notified because you commented at the WP:Requested move that precipitated the discussion.

Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 04:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No where in the Kavanagh assassination article does it mention terrorism.

Mangione hasn't been convicted.

These are, as the section heading says, serious BLP violations. I don't want to but if you do this again I'll have to consider a topic ban. Doug Weller talk 13:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prosecutors have also declared that because his crime "was a felony that involved, or was intended to promote, a federal crime of terrorism," he is eligible to face terrorism-related punishment enhancements.[5] Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 14:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MANGIONE is charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with one count of Murder in the First Degree, in furtherance of terrorism; two counts of Murder in the Second Degree, one of which is charged as killing as an act of terrorism[6] Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add these refs. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller I believe the above refs are sufficient. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. You can ask at WP:BLPN or WP:RSN. Please don’t repeat you edits unless you get agreement from the community. Doug Weller talk 17:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allthemilescombined1! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Would like to redirect a redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Allthemilescombined1, I noticed on your user page that you highlight many fun edits that you have made in mostly BLPs. After reviewing these edits I was surprised as many (but not all!) seem clearly trivial and/or non-encyclopedic and should be deleted per (at least) WP:NOTDIARY.

Some of these have already been reverted by other users - Nora Ephron edit: reversion, James Blunt edit: reversion

On your user page you actually note a few other examples where other "cute" edits were reverted by a single user - [7], [8], [9]

Meanwhile there are a few clear cases of trivial and non-encylopedic content that have yet to be reverted, especially the sexuality-related part of this Mario Cantone edit. But I think there are also issues with - just as a few examples - [10] and parts of [11].

While making other changes to the Woodpecker article I removed this anecdote as I am more comfortable making changes to zoology related articles. I left your edits to the BLPs as is although I will probably revert the Mario Cantone one, I'll leave the rest up to you to decide what to do with.

I don't want to take your joy away and I hope that you can keep making fun edits that are due/encyclopedic - like your Awkwafina edits, and several others that you highlight on your talk page! But just hoping you can make sure that your edits are truly encyclopedic going forward, especially as they relate to BLPs - thanks :) NicheSports (talk) 04:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Antisemitism in social work. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because This is a mess. It contains refbombs and the single example it lists is not antisemitism as far as I can tell. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Polygnotus (talk) 00:18, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omer Shem Tov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Shem Tov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 19:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've had other people warn you before about editing in BLP spaces - so none of this should be particularly surprising - but Wikipedia does have particularly high standards in sourcing in BLPs. I'm a bit concerned about some of your edits on Zohran Mamdani. You have repeatedly tried to insert pejorative claims into the article including here where you suggested that Mamdani (a non-white person) was somehow "whiter" than Hakim Jeffries [12] and instances of inserting the antisemitism pejorative [13] [14]. Furthermore your argumentation about CAIR and the ADL borders on WP:NOTFORUM. I would suggest you need to exercise greater caution when editing articles about BLPs. Simonm223 (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discontinue gravedancing like you did at Special:Diff/1301619045. TarnishedPath^talk 01:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the consensus of the Wikipedia community, you have been topic-banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. Details on how to appeal this topic ban can be found here; note that in most cases editing productively and without controversy for at least six months on other topics is considered best practice before appealing. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:54, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you make claims about another editor's conduct, on a noticeboard, like you did at Special:Permalink/1303734914#TBAN appeal (and request to re-open Close Challenge). You need to leave them a message on their talk page. Also, you should make yourself aware of WP:FORUMSHOP. If you continue with this behaviour I will seek to have you indefinitely banned. TarnishedPath^talk 01:24, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed the appeal you've opened as unsuccessful. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can my request for a mentor be honored? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish During the appeal, I requested a mentor to help me avoid making the same mistakes after the TBan is lifted. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to start that process of learning now, with someone who is uninvolved in the topic space. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this would help me understand where I went wrong better, so I can improve. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No one can assign you a mentor, so you'd have to find someone willing to mentor you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allthemilescombined1:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme What Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been seeking mentorship after getting topic-banned. Speaking from the position of someone who was previously topic-banned and who successfully appealed that ban, I might be able to mentor you. First, what do you want out of mentorship, and second, what kinds of areas do you aim to edit in? 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 20:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicdat Thanks for your offer. I would like to understand how my behavior led to my I/P topic ban; maybe that would help me regain my enthusiasm for editing wikipedia. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:09, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I don't believe you were ever topic banned from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict per se; the ANI discussion found that [b]y the consensus of the Wikipedia community, Allthemilescombined1 is topic-banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. I will give you my answer to your question soon once I wade through the background to it. From a look at your recent contributions, it seems like you enjoy creating articles; this is a good sign and probably one of the reasons why you avoided a site ban. Have you considered trying to expand one of those articles or similar to good article status? In addition to being a very satisfying activity, it might persuade editors that you can be a net positive in these areas. For instance, I see that in an article that you have edited, Yiddish theatre, I see that most of the references need to be converted to shortened footnotes, and that many paragraphs are unreferenced. Would you be interested in trying to improve that article? 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 12:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these suggestions. There is an article I moved to mainspace, which was moved back to draft by another editor, and I do have hopes to expand it. I'm not super interested in Yiddish theatre - I had just read one item that interested me. I do want to help where I am needed, though I admit formatting is not my favorite area. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. That seems like an article that could definitely be expanded, but modern-day antisemitism is getting dangerously close to areas that could fall under your topic ban. If you want to improve that article, you'd have to be careful with the text that you add, and the presence of that material related to Israel probably makes the article fall under the topic ban. This is probably why your best bet is to edit somewhere that is as far away from the Arab–Israeli conflict as you can get. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:46, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violations of your topic ban on the Arab-Israeli Conflict, as you did here. Topic bans apply to ALL pages on Wikipedia. You are not allowed to comment on the conflict, in any way, shape, or form, on any page on Wikipedia, barring to appeal your topic ban (which you previously did, and had the appeal denied). Be advised that multiple editors in that appeal discussion regarded your existing topic ban as too lenient; further violations may well lead to more restrictive sanctions being applied.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dina Strachan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough for a wiki

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run: U, V, W | Asian women Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Women in Red's Asian women event is part of the global Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 campaign. You are welcome to add your contributions to both event pages. Tip of the Month: Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each biography, including at least one source for each paragraph. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year. 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women) 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Allthemilescombined1, please note that your community-imposed topic ban from the Arab–Israeli conflict can only be appealed through the procedures described in Wikipedia:Banning policy § Review and reversal of bans. As such, your comment at User talk:Jimbo Wales § Please review my history on Wikipedia is a violation of your topic ban. Because your appeal was declined by the community on 15 September, please participate in areas that are not covered by your topic ban to establish a track record of constructive editing before you submit another appeal. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 12:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you disclose an interest in medicine on your User: page, I would like to invite you to put Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine on your watchlist, and to join discussions whenever you're interested. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a violation of your topic ban. Your topic ban is broadly construed. Linking a reference that explictly calls out the Arab-Iraeli Conflict is a violation of your topic ban from the Arab-Israeli Conflict, and this is far too close to outright requesting proxy editing to avoid your topic ban. You are blocked from editing Wikipedia for one month. Once the block expires, completely avoid anything remotely resembling the Arab-Israeli Conflict as the next violation of your topic ban will almost certainly result in an indefinite block. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:31, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025 Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025 Tip of the Month: Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025 Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Issue 26—January 2026

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Happy New Year from WikiProject Medicine. Last year was tumultuous, with large language models competing for readers’ attention. These models often sound authoritative despite frequent hallucinations. They are however effective at writing in clear, accessible language, something research shows we often fail to achieve in medical articles. One of the goals of the Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to ensure that our top-importance articles are understandable, as this is one of the six B-class criteria they should meet.

Recent recognized content

Polycystic ovary syndrome nom. Femke, reviewed by DoctorWhoFan91 and IntentionallyDense Anne Bayley nom. Dclemens1971, reviewed by Actual7 Abortion in Mauritius nom. Vigilantcosmicpenguin, reviewed by Thebiguglyalien O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome nom Strange Orange, reviewed by IntentionallyDense

Nominated for review

Modafinil nom. Maxim Masiutin COVID-19 lab leak theory nom. TarnishedPath Endometriosis nom. Femke Cyril Karabus nom jolielover History of penicillin nom. Hawkeye7 Asthma Heart Coeliac disease

WP:MED News

• 2025 saw one Arbitration case related to WikiProject Medicine, related to conduct around transgender healthcare and people. The case saw a number of editors banned or topic-banned.
• Thanks to Earwig, recent article talk discussions are updated again at WP:MED, so you never miss an interesting discussion. Our participant list is working too!
• The Vital Signs campaign has kicked off. We've already removed misinformation from breast cancer, updated the management section of asthma, and assessed what needs to happen at autism. Can you help too?
  • Adopt an article, fix obvious mistakes, and assess if it now meets the B-class criteria in the progress table
  • Help out with any of the smaller tasks, such as ensuring that the new ICD-11 codes are included, or updated the disease frequency and mortality with the Global Burden of Disease study, published last October.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello Allthemilescombined1:

This month, February 2026, WikiProject Women in Green is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions and guidelines and feel free to ask for a mentor to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]