Talk:Typhoon Usagi (2024)

Page move consideration

Well, since they announced that the name Usagi is officially decommissioned in the list. Shouldn't this page be moved to just simply Typhoon Usagi only? PandaB31 (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Sinsyuan✍️🌏🚀 03:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wind speed/pressure

It was preliminarily 915mb during the first updates, but it was later revised to 933mb. JTWC only does windspeed in intervals of 5kt, so it has to be 130kt. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 02:50, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneEdgar could probably say more about it. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 02:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 11:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Usagi (2024)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: HurricaneEdgar (talk · contribs) 07:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 13:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Will review this article in the next two weeks. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.

Criterion 1

  • the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) classified the system as a tropical depression, citing the JTWC is the one who did the prognostic reasoning. Please include the JTWC in this sentence.
  • 27W, as → 27W as
  • Satellite imagery reveals → Satellite imagery revealed
  • while satellite imagery shows a → while satellite imagery showed a
  • Authorities advised people evacuated due to previous typhoons Yinxing (Marce) and Toraji (Nika) not to return home. this is very confusing.
  • I suggest splitting paragraph 2 in preparations and impact.

Criterion 2

  • Source 26 needs to be archived.
  • Same with source 27, 28, 29, and 30.
  • Source 43 needs a translation of the title.
  • Source 44's website is not the same as others.
  • Kindly add website/publisher for source 53.

Criterion 3

  • I think the lead is too long.

The Rest of the Criteria

  • Criterion 4: Article seems neutral.
  • Criterion 5: The article seems stable.
  • Criterion 6: Images are good with nice captions.

This article is really nice but there are some issues. @HurricaneEdgar: pinging nom. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneEdgar: reping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will fix that issue later. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 13:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneEdgar: Have you fixed these issues yet? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 11:51, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneEdgar: There were no revisions since this review. If no further revisions are made, this GAN may be failed on October 10 for inactivity. Regards, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’ll probably wait until tomorrow to fix that issue since I’ve been busy with college and focusing on the topic in Syria. HurricaneEdgar 11:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HurricaneEdgar: hello? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since I already finished, did I miss it when I addressed the issue? HurricaneEdgar 01:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What issue? I listed multiple issues, some of them you missed. Please fix them, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 04:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All issues have been addressed. HurricaneEdgar 10:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Did some minor fixes; going to pass. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 11:00, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Typhoon_Usagi_(2024)