This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of game related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Magic: The GatheringWikipedia:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringTemplate:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringMagic: The Gathering
This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Note: This is the total of all the years fundraisers, not just one year that this source covers. All fundraiser totals have a source in the article.
Created by John Cummings (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, neutral and plagiarism free (Earwig picks up some phrases, but they are names of organisations). I'm inlcined to pass the hook, as although the cumulative total isn't referenced, each individual amount is, and I don't construe adding numbers together as original research. QPQ is done. No deal breaker, but I wonder if The Acadedmic Box needs its own section, or whether the article flows better if it goes after Post Malone. I don't play Magic, so welcome being educated if it should have its own heading. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lajmmoore thanks so much :) I don't play Magic either, I wrote it because of their fundraising work. I'll ask around and see if I can find someone who knows about Magic to see what they think about the box section. Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, neutral and plagiarism free (Earwig picks up some phrases, but they are names of organisations). I'm inlcined to pass the hook, as although the cumulative total isn't referenced, each individual amount is, and I don't construe adding numbers together as original research. QPQ is done. No deal breaker, but I wonder if The Acadedmic Box needs its own section, or whether the article flows better if it goes after Post Malone. I don't play Magic, so welcome being educated if it should have its own heading. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:17, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
I moved it, but it's no deal breaker for DYK Lajmmoore (talk) 11:52, 14 April 2025 (UTC)