Talk:Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

This article has a lot of external links which should be turned into regular references, like this one.[1] WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest (CoI) notice

My work on this page between 2 February to 31 August, 2019 is as a paid but unaffiliated consultant. I was hired as an outside, 3rd-party writer to improve this and related pages to Wikipedia encyclopedic standards, and to bring remedy to some of the prior concerns about single-source data. I have no other employment or financial relationship with the Foundation. DeknMike (talk) 02:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the transparent disclosure @DeknMike:, I have added the standardized template for this on top of this talkpage (please feel free to tweak it if necessary). Please also read the detailed information at WP:COI and WP:PAID, and suggest further changes in affected articles on article talk instead of editing these articles yourself. I'll post some additional links fyi on your user talkpage. GermanJoe (talk) 05:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contract is concluded, and I have been paid. I am no longer affiliated with OMRF, and no longer have a CoI. DeknMike (talk) 16:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

Information to be changed: Change the title for the second section from 'Research' to 'Areas of Research' and add the following:

Explanation of issue: The purpose is to provide a summary of the overall goals of the OMRF. In a separate request, I will adjust some of the research paragraphs to reflect current status. DeknMike (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The article already contains a large amount of information referenced by OMRI OMRF. I am disinclined to add more information which isn't referenced by reliable, WP:SECONDARY sources unconnected to OMRI OMRF or the healthcare industry.[a] Regards,  Spintendo  10:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ This is not predominantly information about OMRI's OMRF's history, which is innocent enough to be referenced by the company itself. When the claims have to do with areas of research in the present, I'd like reliable WP:SECONDARY sources to act as references.

Edit request

DeknMike (talk) 21:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 28-JAN-2020

  Edit request declined  

  • It was previously asked that reliable, independent, secondary sources be provided for this information. The sources provided thus far do not meet that expectation. In particular, sources from the OMRF — including one written by Art Cotton, who is the vice president of development for the OMRF — continue to be proposed to be added. These sources are unacceptable.

Regards,  Spintendo  23:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest, sources

Firstly, it looks as if the bulk of this article was added with this edit on 25 May 2007, and as if that edit was made by or on behalf of the institution itself ("Update from the organization"). Secondly, there are essentially no reliable, independent, secondary sources at all in the page (the few that are not to the website of the thing appear to be connected and/or press releases). I suggest we (a) remove the bulk of the self-references, other than those that verify basic facts such as where it is; and (b) remove whatever text then remains unsourced. The real question, of course, is whether there is enough solid independent coverage elsewhere for it to meet WP:NCORP – there certainly isn't here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the article's research section

Hello,

I’d like to recommend edits to the Research section of this article. At present, this section is very out of date and some of the content in it is poorly sourced or has other problems. As an OMRF employee, I have a conflict of interest, so rather than editing myself, I am proposing them for review. I am grateful for your assistance and time. Also please note that there are a few sources which are either paywalled or not available online, so I’ve included the passages that support my proposed Wikipedia language where they appear.

Thanks very much for looking over these ideas.Hl eikomala (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Hl eikomala (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that these changes are appropriately sourced and represent a significant improvement over the current article text. However, given the volume of changes I'd be grateful for a second opinion from another editor. Axad12 (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 21-NOV-2024

Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request.

Regards,  Spintendo  10:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revised requests for updates to research

Hello. I’ve previously suggested edits to the Research section of this article, which is very out of date[1]. A reviewing editor offered feedback on how request edits could be improved. I’ve incorporated those suggestions into this revised request. I am an employee of OMRF and following COI policy. Thank you.

1 In the Research section, beneath the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation#Alzheimer's and brain diseases subsection, please replace the existing content with the following two sentences:

In 2000, OMRF researchers created an inhibitor that, in vitro, stopped an enzyme thought to lead to progression of Alzheimer's disease.[1] In 2007, OMRF researchers found evidence of a molecular mechanism that links a gene called “E4” to the onset of Alzheimer’s.[2]

Why it should be changed: The present subsection is very poorly sourced, with much of the information having no source at all. Parts of it read like resumes for individual researchers, or are otherwise WP:PROMOTIONAL in tone. This new version is condensed and only contains information that can be confirmed by medical journals.


2 In the Research section, please change the name of the first subsection:

Change from:

“Alzheimer's and brain diseases”

Change to:

“Aging & Metabolism”

Why it should be changed:

“Aging & Metabolism” is the current name of this research program at OMRF and this is how the press now refers to it. See: the Journal Record and The New York Times It can also be established on the OMRF website. As an academic institution, relying on the OMFR website for details about its own organizational structure is consistent with use of primary sources on other good articles about academic institutions. Eg Pomona College.

3 In the Research section, please change the name of the second subsection:

Change from:

Cancer and immunobiology

Change to:

“Cell Cycle & Cancer Biology”

Why it should be changed:

‘Cell Cycle & Cancer Biology’ is the current name of this research program at OMRF and this is how the press now refers to it. See: the Journal Record. It can also be established on the OMRF website. See #3 for comment on use of academic institution primary sources.

4: In the Research section, please change the name of the fourth subsection: Change from:

“Lupus and autoimmune diseases”

Change to:

“Genes & Human Disease”.

Why it should be changed:

‘Genes & Human Disease’ is the current name of this research program at OMRF and this is how the press now refers to it. See: the Journal Record. It can also be established on the OMRF website. See #3 for comment on use of academic institution primary sources.

5: In the Research section (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation#Research), please insert the following sentences to make a new paragraph at the beginning of the section:

OMRF conducts its research across five different divisions:[3] Aging & Metabolism,[4] Arthritis & Clinical Immunology,[5] Cardiovascular Biology,[6] Cell Cycle & Cancer Biology,[7] and Genes & Human Disease.[8]

Why it should be changed: This paragraph provides up to date information about how the foundation organizes its research clusters (including changes to names of some centers, as established in requests 1- 3 above.)

6: In the current Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation#Alzheimer's and brain diseases subsection, please add the following sentence to become the new third sentence.

In 2023, OMRF researchers received a grant from the Alzheimer's Association to study the connection between estrogen and Alzheimer’s in postmenopausal women.[9]

Why it should be changed: The current subsection is missing information past 2007. The suggested sentence uses a reliable source to summarize recent research at OMRF and helps to bring the subsection up to date.

7: In the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation#Cancer and immunobiology subsection, please replace the existing paragraph with the following version:

In 2001, OMRF researchers developed a test using prohibitin genotyping to assess breast cancer risk in women.[10] In 2006, OMRF researchers demonstrated the reversibility of mitotic exit (cell division) in vertebrate cells.[11]

Why it should be changed:

The existing version contains inaccurate or out of date information, is poorly sourced, and in places reads like a resume for individual researchers. This new version removes WP:TMI, provides reliable sourcing for all statements and focuses only on research findings from leading peer-reviewed journals.

8: In the Heart and blood diseases subsection, please replace the existing two sentences with the following:

In the 1980s, OMRF researchers studied protein C[12]and developed a treatment for sepsis which utilized activated protein C.[13]

Why it should be changed: This version provides information about OMRF research into protein C in the 1980s that eventually led to the development of a treatment in 1994. It’s noteworthy peer-reviewed research that merits inclusion in this article.

Thanks for reviewing. Hl eikomala (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Spintendo, who reviewed the previous request. Rusalkii (talk) 07:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I'm sorry that this has been sitting around for 2 months, I have updated the article based on your requests. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Lin, Xinli; Kolsch, Gerald; Tang, Jordan; al, et (15 February 2000). "Human aspartic protease memapsin 2 cleaves the β-secretase site of β-amyloid precursor protein". Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 97: 1456–1460. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1456. Retrieved 12 February 2025.
  2. ^ He, Xiangyuan; Tang, Jordan; al, et (11 April 2007). "Apolipoprotein Receptor 2 and X11α/β Mediate Apolipoprotein E-Induced Endocytosis of Amyloid-β Precursor Protein and β-Secretase, Leading to Amyloid-β Production". Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (15): 4052–4060. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3993-06.2007.
  3. ^ "Programs". OMRF. Retrieved 6 February 2025.
  4. ^ "OMRF adds two principal researchers". Journal Record (Oklahoma City). 12 February 2019. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
  5. ^ "Oklahoma researcher earns Lupus Foundation award". Journal Record. 3 February 2021. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  6. ^ "OMRF receives $3.5 million to study blood clotting". Journal Record. 15 September 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  7. ^ "Presbyterian Health Foundation funds key research in OKC". Journal Record. 17 January 2023. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  8. ^ "OMRF receives $1.2 million to study diseases of aging". Journal Record. 20 October 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  9. ^ Breasette, Austin (30 October 2023). "OMRF scientist receives grant from Alzheimer's Association for research". KFOR. Retrieved 1 March 2024.
  10. ^ {{cite journal| author=Jupe ER, Badgett AA, Neas BR, Craft MA, Mitchell DS, Resta R | display-authors=etal| title=Single nucleotide polymorphism in prohibitin 3' untranslated region and breast-cancer susceptibility. | journal=Lancet | year= 2001 | volume= 357 | issue= 9268 | pages= 1 | pmid=11377649 | doi=10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04747-4 | pmc= | url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(00)04747-4/abstract}
  11. ^ Potapova TA, Daum JR, Pittman BD, Hudson JR, Jones TN, Satinover DL | display-authors=etal (2006) The reversibility of mitotic exit in vertebrate cells. Nature 440 (7086):954-8. DOI:10.1038/nature04652 PMID: 16612388
  12. ^ Taylor FB, Carroll RC, Gerrard J, Esmon CT, Radcliffe RD (1981) Lysis of clots prepared from whole blood and plasma. Fed Proc 40 (7):2092-8. PMID: 7194803
  13. ^ Taylor FB, Chang A, Hinshaw LB, Esmon CT, Archer LT, Beller BK (1984) A model for thrombin protection against endotoxin. Thromb Res 36 (2):177-85. DOI:10.1016/0049-3848(84)90339-6 PMID: 6506035