Talk:I Don't Wanna Live Forever

Requested move 9 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I Don't Wanna Live ForeverI Don't Wanna Live Forever (Fifty Shades Darker)I Don't Wanna Live Forever (Fifty Shades Darker) – Full title of song, and instead of speedy-deleting the full title's namespace to make room for the move, thinking it could be moved by an admin. Ss112 18:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song is not listed as "I Don't Wanna Live Forever (from Fifty Shades Darker), it's sold as "I Don't Wanna Live Forever (Fifty Shades Darker)" and its single cover lists that full title before additionally listing "from the Fifty Shades Darker soundtrack". Since when do we have standards on what a subtitle is intended to do? Hint: we haven't. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's a subtitle for promo and should be considered a second title. It isnt the name of the song just to mention somewhere that it was for the movie, as mentioned above with the article (like withEarned It). Give this song the same treatment. Cyberjoel95 (talk) 11:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Genre

Electro-R&B really? First of all that genre doesn't exist. Secondly, this song is a cookie cutter PBR&B composition. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 07:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Don't Wanna Live Forever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:I Don't Wanna Live Forever/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 13:45, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 14:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 14:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

@Ippantekina:

  • Should add a summary of the music video to the beginning of the third paragraph in the lead.
  • Why the order of genres in lead is different from the infobox.
  • In the Background and release should include the labels for US radio releases and as well the Italy radio airplay.
  • Don't need NYC, CA and Virginia for the studios locations; just Brooklyn, LA and Virginia Beach is enough.
  • Might as well include NightBird Recording Studios and Sterling Sound Studios in the Background and release section.
  • Genres are again in a different order at the Composition section.
  • Rewrite the first sentence of the Composition section as - ""I Don't Wanna Live Forever" is 4 minutes and 5 seconds long, and is a [...]"
  • Just 3 refs would be enough for "Many critics regarded the production as sultry"; avoid WP:OVERKILL
  • Awards-related prose should be in the Accolades section; not the Critical reception section.
  • Update ref 25 with a direct link instead of a redirect.
  • No need for any of these four notes; refs could be directly included in the prose.
  • Don't have to mention all the certifications in the "Commercial performance" section.
  • "the music video for "I Don't Wanna Live Former"" - former or forever..
  • "Credits adapted from the liner notes of Fifty Shades Darker: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack" - full stop (.) at the end.

Vestrian24Bio 05:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: just to make sure, you got the response above. Vestrian24Bio 13:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops I didn't see them. Will act shortly. Ippantekina (talk) 02:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Vestrian24Bio: I think all should be addressed. I had to manually insert archive URLs for some refs as IABot is not adding them... Ippantekina (talk) 07:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source spot-check: pass

All else good, passing for GA. Vestrian24Bio 11:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle talk 13:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

Ippantekina (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]