Talk:Hurricane Larry

Creation

*Oppose creation of this article as it is another fish spinner that hasn't done anything out of the ordinary. NoahTalk 11:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does Larry still exist?

I looked at the OPC's pressure map and I cannot tell if the 2 lows merged or passed by each other. Do these warnings apply to the remnants of larry or the powerful low? PlanetsForLife 12:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Larry was absorbed by the other low between 18Z and 00Z. It's more clearly seen by the 3 hourly maps the WPC generates. Supportstorm (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

stolen boat and missing thief?

Is there more information on this boat stolen from a moorage in the Halifax Nova Scotia area? It sounds like a very bizarre story as yacht thefts are not really something on the radar here in this part of Canada. 72.142.92.198 (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hurricane Karry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 17 § Hurricane Karry until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Larry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chicdat (talk · contribs) 16:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:11, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Alright I finally got around to reviewing this.

Lead
  • "Finally, on September 13, the storm was absorbed by a larger extratropical cyclone near Greenland." - Finally feels dramatic and unnecessary
  • Done.
Met history
  • "On August 26, the National Hurricane Center (NHC) was monitoring a tropical wave that was going to emerge off the coast of West Africa."
  • Ref 5 isn't loading for me. Could you change the tropical weather outlooks to text using the archive?
  • Done. It seems the original author did a typo, it was actually the 27th.
  • Also, you should mention that the NHC thought this wave had a decent chance of development, that's why they were monitoring it, right?
  • Added giving it a 20% chance of formation for the next five days.
  • "The tropical wave exited Africa on August 30, surrounded by an area of low pressure that had generally westward movement." - surrounded isn't the right term, since a tropical wave is an axis. If you don't want to use the TCR wording of "accompanied", then you could say "The tropical wave exited Africa on August 30, associated with an area of low pressure which moved generally westward."
  • Replaced "surrounded" with "associated", replaced "that had generally westward movement" with "moving generally westward", linked area of low pressure.
  • "the NHC designated the system as a tropical depression at 18:00 on August 31" - you need to specify it's UTC
  • Done.
  • " receiving the name Larry. Larry moved generally westward " - can you rewrite it so the same name doesn't happen twice in a row?
  • Replaced with "the storm"
  • " But Larry quickly recovered from this" - the "But" isn't necessary
  • Done.
  • ". At 12:00 UTC on September 7, Larry weakened to 110 mph (175 km/h), leading reconnaissance aircraft to designate it as a Category 2 hurricane" - Recon doesn't downgrade a storm
  • Replaced with "becoming a Category 2 hurricane"
  • "By 00:00 UTC on September 11, Larry's speed had increased to 45 mph (75 km/h) as it approached the southeastern coast of Newfoundland, moving over Marticut Island." - I don't know what Marticut Island is, there's no link, and I'm not sure why it's mentioned
  • Removed.
  • "At 03:30 UTC on September 11, the storm made landfall in Newfoundland as a Category 1 hurricane with sustained winds of 80 mph (130 km/h) and a minimum central pressure of 960 millibars (28 inHg)." - where was the landfall?
  • Clarified.
  • "This storm caused hurricane-force winds and over 4 feet (120 centimetres) of snow in Greenland." - why is this in the met history and not impacts?
  • Removed the part about snow in Greenland. The hurricane-force winds part is technically related to the met history but if you want me to remove that too I can.
Preps and impacts
  • "No power outages or deaths were recorded, and overall damage was minimal." - could you elaborate on any of the damage that did occur? You mentioned winds and waves, but no impacts
  • TCR is not great for details, but it vaguely mentions impact to beaches due to storm surge, so I added that.
  • The lead says that the person went missing from the stolen boat, but the impact section doesn't specifically say when the person was declared missing, or if they were ever declared dead. Do you have any more on that, like the name of the boat? I can help find more info
  • From what I can find, its name was Secret Plans, and the person was an Antiguan fugitive named Karin Marley Simons. Is this WP:DUE for inclusion in the article?
  • Here is some more info - IDK, that sounds pretty interesting, that the person was a fugitive, stole another boat, and then went missing. Who knows, the person might've faked their death and actually gotten away with it. I think mentioning the boat name makes sense, since that's pretty standard when a boat goes missing during a storm. You probably don't need to mention the person's name, I only asked to see if I could find out more information. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The impact section switches from having imperial units first or having metric units first. Considering the article is Canada-focused, I think all units should be metric first, but the whole article should be the same for consistency
  • The impact section is now fully metric. Since the MH is cited to the extremely imperial NHC, I'm hesitant to make it metric as well, but I guess per consistency, it should be done. More on that below.🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Mayor Danny Breen confirmed that the hurricane caused a significant amount of damage around the city. " - what city?
  • St. John's, added and linked.
  • Could you link the Highway 90 that was damaged?
  • Linked.
  • "In Greenland, the snowfall forecast for ex-Larry, one of the few storms from the remnants of a tropical cyclone to pass so far north, was up to 4 feet of snow (120 cm) with some places along the coast receiving a rainfall equivalent." - that needs to be rewritten, it's too much for one sentence.
  • Done.
  • "Wind and snow caused a blizzard at Summit Camp, a weather station located on the ice sheet over 10,000 ft (3,000 m) above sea level." - same issue as earlier, the units need to be consistent with what's first
  • Done.

The article is decent, just some rough spots here or there, but nothing that should be too difficult to fix. Lemme know if you have any questions, Chicdat (talk · contribs). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:11, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything but the units problem, which I'm still mulling over. No other Atlantic hurricane article uses metric first, but then again this is in Canadian English. I'm not sure. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hurricane Juan uses metric first for the impact section. It's no big deal so I'll pass the article as is, but if you want to do more for the article in the future, it's something to consider. Good job on the article! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 13:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Larry on September 5, 2021
Hurricane Larry on September 5, 2021
Improved to Good Article status by Chicdat (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 22:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Is it actually confirmed that the Antiguan man was the one who stole the boat? According to the two articles cited, it seems the boat owner is merely speculating about that. Also, are we sure that the two sources are reliable? I have no view on reliability—I just haven't heard of either Ocean Navigator or Maritime Executive before, and they both seem like more niche publications outside of the mainstream media. We could potentially use CBC News instead: [1][2].
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: I'm thinking we can rescue this hook by being more clear both in the hook and the article that the connection between the missing man and the boat is speculative, and perhaps using the CBC News articles instead of the maritime sources (although I am okay with leaving the maritime sources if we insist). I would also err on the side of caution per WP:BLPCRIME and avoid naming the missing man directly and describe him as an "Antiguan man" instead of a "criminal". Mz7 (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]