Follow Me (Lyme & Cybelle song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 30, 2025 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 23, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that lyme & cybelle's "Follow Me" was the first of only three songs by Warren Zevon to chart on the Billboard Hot 100?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Follow Me (lyme & cybelle song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: VirreFriberg (talk · contribs) 20:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 09:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will review this one today! --K. Peake 09:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you sure raga rock should be listed as a genre of the song since the prose seems to indicate it was an influence rather than a genre?
• ""Follow Me" is a" → "It is a" although the genres seem disordered here; for instance folk rock is listed as an influence and raga as a genre when it seems to be the opposite from what is written
• Any instances where there is three points listed in a sentence using "and" should place a comma before the connective
• "after the duo were" → "after lyme & cybelle were" although the Wrecking Crew are not mentioned in the body
• Remove overly obvious wikilink on California
• "with critics noting" → "with a few critics noting"
• Maybe add an example of one of those compilation albums in the lead?

• Why is there a comma in the name of Fairfax High School?
• "from Santagelo's artist name cybelle" → "From Santagelo's artist name, cybelle"
• In the last sentence, should on the spot be re-worded to something else in your own words at the start since it is cited as a quote at the end?
• Change BPM to beats per minute to be specific
• [10][6][11] should be in numerical order
• You should end the author's quote at 1966 and re word to into a length of 2:30
• The third paragraph should be moved to be the second instead since this is focused on background info, therefore should come before the song's composition
• "keyboardist Larry Knechtel and" → "keyboardist Larry Knechtel, and" why are the Wrecking Crew not mentioned here?

• Remove overly obvious wikilink on California
• "It fared similarly well" → "The song fared similarly well"
• "the first on April 23 together" → "the first on April 23, 1966, together"
• [31][22] should be in numerical order
• "believe the song" → "believes the song"
• Should the word noting really be used twice in this same sentence?
• Remove speech marks around successful since this is a common term
• Remove wikilink on San Francisco
• Last para looks good!

• Good

• Good

• Could ref 8 be used in ref 9's place since the only page being used for that ref is the same as the last of only two for ref 8?
• Cite Ultimate Classic Rock as magazine instead on ref 41

• On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this came through quickly! --K. Peake 11:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Kyle Peake, edited the article after your suggestions! Thanks you once more for the constructive criticism! VirreFriberg (talk) 21:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  VirreFriberg You still need to change the wording earlier in the sentence to not being on the spot in your own words and complete the cite of Ultimate Classic Rock as magazine only. --K. Peake 10:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi @Kyle Peake! I fixed the issue regarding the Ultimate Classic Rock citation (I was slightly confused). However, I disagree with your assessment that the song isn't raga rock, since Zevon describes it as such (raga and roll), as does Ritchie Unterberger (raga rock-tinged). I instead re-formatted the opening statement to encompass all four genres. VirreFriberg (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  VirreFriberg The sentence still uses on the spot twice, can you revise please? --K. Peake 17:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Kyle Peake, Done! VirreFriberg (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Pass now, thanks for finally clearing this one up! --K. Peake 07:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by JuniperChill talk 07:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Zevon

• ... that Lyme & cybelle's Follow Me (1966) was the first of only three entries singer Warren Zevon (pictured) charted on the US Billboard Hot 100?

• Source: Gallucci, Michael (January 13, 2023). "Warren Zevon Albums Ranked Worst to Best". Ultimate Classic Rock. Retrieved June 30, 2025. https://ultimateclassicrock.com/warren-zevon-albums-ranked/

Whitburn, Joel (2001). Top Pop Singles 1955-1999 (9th ed.). US: Record Research Inc. ISBN 0-89820-139-X. Retrieved June 30, 2025, pages 392 & 721

• • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by VirreFriberg (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

VirreFriberg (talk) 11:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• General eligibility:
• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @VirreFriberg: Everything looks good. I made some changes to the hook (bolded the title of the subject article, clarified that Zevon was a singer and removed "as a performer"). Otherwise, good to go. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]