Farrer Park MRT station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 25, 2025 Good article nominee Not listed October 31, 2025 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. Singapore Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Does the Farrer Park MRT Station really have 14 exits as seen on it's page? I have stepped into this MRT station about 3-4 times already (in December 2006) but I was only able to see 4-6 exits. Does it really have 14 exits or was I not keen/observant enough? Acs4b 15:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One link at Exits shows an Exit to City Square Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia LOL!!! ;-)), half way around the globe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Square_Mall —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.143.182 (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Farrer Park MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110324133537/http://infopedia.nl.sg:80/articles/SIP_1582_2009-10-07.html to http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1582_2009-10-07.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Farrer Park MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 09:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Icepinner (talk · contribs) 11:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, hello, hello! Hope your efforts to contact the LTA for Outram Park MRT station have been going well so far (they can take a while to respond though...) Anyways, Imma review this for the May Backlog Drive. Keep in mind I'm new when it comes to reviewing GAN so a bit of paticence is appreciated :) Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 11:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YOOOOOOO TYSM FOR REVIEWING THIS ARTICLE!!!! =DDD @Icepinner brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 12:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008 made my first round of comments, please take a look at them (feel free to disagree with my suggestions given reasonable justification). To be honest, I'm quite concerned about the article in its current stage. Unless if those changes are made within a reasonable timeframe, it may not be a GA (which would be shame, considering you and Zkang's aim of making the NEL a Featured Topic)Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 06:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner I have addressed some of your points, and will get to the rest ASAP (also got Outram Park MRT station's FA nom =D) brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 00:27, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright, do take your time :) Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 01:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner i should have responded to most of my points, will be expanding article asap brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 06:06, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Also @Brachy0008 Zkang gave me some sources that you could use, if you're not already using it. Map (really early), Art in Transit Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 07:48, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner i should have addressed most of the points alr brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 12:42, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008 Great! I know you have holidays so do chillout. Afterwards, we'll continue the GA review, unless you wish for someone to carry out those changes on your behalf? Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 05:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner won't mind if someone continues for me but best leave it as it is for the holiday (will be back around the 18th) brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 06:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008 I'm gonna have to unfortunately close this nomination and I say this because I don't think me "failing" you is suitable for this context. It has stalled for 7 days or so (technically even more) and it's almost there to meeting the GAN criteria but the lead isn't completed and there are no citations in the infobox where needed :( I know this may be discouraging for you especially after Outram Park station's FAC but there's honestly not a lot of major rework that needs to be done. Just follow the above comments (as well as focusing on prose and stuff, which is a prominent issue with your past GA and FA nominations) and it should be ready for GAN. In fact, I'll send you a cookie or an equivalent award if you fix these issues and successfully renominate it for GAN. Keep editing and I hope to see this article renominated! :) Icepinner (formerly Imbluey2). Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 07:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Icepinner thanks =D

will get to your points as soon as i can brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 11:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• The lead is really short and doesn't summarise the article adequately (it leaves out incidents, art in transit, etc). Please add more (including details that will be suggested below or in the near future)

• Suggest adding more landmarks
  • Added (as well as poening)
• Is there info for the accessibility of the station as well as if bicycle facilities are available?
  • There is info for accessibility which I copy-pasted from Outram Park MRT station. As for bicycle facilities, not sure about that.
• Is there any information on the architecture of the station other than the "illuminated toilet seat debate" (that would be a really good DYK, actually)
  • There should be two books that ZKang123 recommended for me to expand Farrer Park and Boon Keng's articles. I managed to take pictures of the pages with the information needed during a visit to the National Library, so I will be expanding them as soon as possible.
• The lighting in Farrer Park creates an optical illusion that looked like an "illuminated toilet seat", which confused a netizen and sparked online discussion this sentence implies that the architects of the station purposely designed the lighting such that it would look like an "illuminated toilet seat" even though it appears not to be the case. Reword this please.
  • Reworded.
    • Checked the FN again and it says that There’s actually a genius reason the lights are shaped that way.
      • Just add "according to 8days, the light was designed to reflect light since the station has no glass ceiling" or something like that
• IF you want (since locked articles can only be accessed in the main National Library Building): add more information on the confusion between Farrer Park and Farrer Road stations. Sources: More confusion,Station names, ONE 'FARRER' STATION TOO MANY. I'm not expecting you to go all the way to Downtown just for this but adding all of these would enhance the article

• Is it possible to expand it? Honestly surprised by how short it is (unless if there are no other sources or details for it). Either way, it needs reworking though. It doesn't sound encyclopaedic imo
  • Yes.
• It is also known for being the site of Singapore's earliest horse racing turf club that draws its name from nearby street Old Racecourse Road. Is it mentioned in any available source? If so, please cite it. If not, seems to be original research
• If possible: Add images for one or both of the Art in Transit artwork

• Fill out more info for [2]
• Add page number for [3]&[4]
• Fill out more info for [6]
• Add URL access level for [15]
• Link for [17] is dead
  • Overall I wouldn't recommend using the Infopedia as a source since it's tertiary. Just use the source the Infopedia uses
• Add archive links for website citations please
  • Went through all the FNs and added the necessary information/archive links. (NewspaperSG is technically a newspaper archive)

Link to Farrer Park's website is dead