This review is transcluded from Talk:Drive-By Lullabies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 23:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 23:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will take on this review. I should have my comments up in a couple of days. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: I've finished the review. Good job overall– I only have a couple of suggestions (in the bullet points below). -Riley1012 (talk) 22:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for taking this. Will get all comments handled tomorrow (EST) Locust member (talk) 01:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review!! All comments should be answered. Locust member (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you! I will pass this article. -Riley1012 (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• She incorporated field recordings that were recorded herself into the album's sound. Change "were" here to "that she recorded herself"
  •  Done
• Music journalists also listed numerous other genres the album's sound was influenced by and can range from. I find the phrasing here awkward, change to something like Music journalists described the album as drawing from a wide range of genres.
  •  Done
• In an interview with Business Insider, she stated that no longer wanted to cater to her fans... Add "she" before "no longer wanted..."
  •  Done
• ...it incorporates a drill rhythm ahead of synthesizer noise wall.... I believe this should be "a synthersizer noise wall"
  •  Done
• It marks the beginning of a three-song sequence that conclude the album's relationship narrative. Change "conclude" to "concludes"
  •  Done

2. Verifiable
The reference layout looks good. Business Insider is only considered reliable in its culture coverage (see WP:BICULTURE), which the piece in this article falls under. The Tweet used is the official DeadAir Records account. Nothing to note about the reliability of the other sources.
Earwig's doesn't show any initial copyright violations (the highlights here are properly attributed quotes and song/album titles). Spot check: 2, 5, 9, 11, and 16 all support the information and are not plagiarized.

• Quinn has described Drive-By Lullabies as a "test run", and had a goal of making it sound messy. Can you add quotation marks around "messy" (since that is how she specifically described the goal)?
  •  Done

3. Broad
The article covers the major aspects of the album without unnecessary detail.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral and properly attributes opinions.

5. Stable
I have read through the talk page and the edit history to verify there are no ongoing edit conflicts.

6. Illustrated
The album cover and audio clip both have non-free use rationales. They are obviously relevant to the article and have suitable captions.