This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Paranormal Low‑importance This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative views Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add link to a documentary by Chris White. He is joined by Michael S. Heiser as an expert. The documentary is referenced on the page about Michael S. Heiser. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SharkMa-san (talk • contribs) 20:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1561 celestial phenomenon over Nuremberg references the documentary website. I checked the previous talk about the subject and I think it is out of date. The accompanying website has been updated since 2013 and Jason Colavito doesn't seem to be a non-notable blogger any more. The documentary is also notable today as it has almost 9 million views. I think the documentary should be considered as included as a party debunking the claims of the series - SharkMa-san (talk) 20:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thosbsamsgom I know you follow this article. There is no talk if it's my monologue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SharkMa-san (talk • contribs) 21:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this website/video is self-published. guidelines say those resources are unreliable regardless of how popular they may be. Zentulku (talk) 07:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an external link is acceptable. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 07:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia should start acknowledging big independent creators. SharkMa-san (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose a change: Wikipedia:Changing policies and guidelines Thosbsamsgom (talk) 19:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a whole podcast dedicated to debunking various claims made by this show and talking about the real-world history behind it. It should have a place in the critical response section: https://solo.to/probsnotaliens

THis is not an RS. Slatersteven (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you going to report no going to the moon and there was huge giants here and we are under a firmament 2001:5B0:B401:5380:18B5:11C0:B888:9E85 (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which episodes covered this? Slatersteven (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of Ancient Aliens episodes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 25 § List of Ancient Aliens episodes until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 04:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]