American Civil Liberties Union has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 17, 2006 Peer review Reviewed March 25, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed February 19, 2012 Good article nominee Listed Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 19, 2020, and January 19, 2023. Current status: Good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Organizations High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Expand : History of tariffs in the United States Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}} Civil Rights Movement High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. To-do list for American Civil Liberties Union: history watch refresh No to-do list assigned. WikiProject Civil Rights Movement to do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : All redlinked articles listed at User:Mitchumch/Movement templates#Civil Rights Movement need to be created. Durham movement (North Carolina) (currently a redirect) Greensboro movement (North Carolina) (currently a redirect) Henry Hezekiah Dee (currently a redirect) Delano Herman Middleton (currently a redirect) Charles Eddie Moore (currently a redirect) Henry Ezekial Smith (currently a redirect) Cleanup : Black Arts Movement Collaborate : Tagging all relevant articles with project template. Expand : And the Walls Came Tumbling Down Medgar Evers The Children (Halberstam) Cambridge movement (civil rights) Browder v. Gayle Strom Thurmond filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 Photo : Milton Galamison • J. Charles Jones • Gloria Richardson • Richard Durham • Freedom Riders • Freedom Summer • March Against Fear • Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom • Youth March for Integrated Schools (1958) • Youth March for Integrated Schools (1959) • Birmingham riot of 1963 • 16th Street Baptist Church bombing (image of bombing) • Bloody Tuesday (1964) • Biloxi wade-ins (image of wade-ins) • Tallahassee bus boycott • Tent City (Tennessee) • Memphis sanitation strike (image of actual strike) • Americus movement • Hebrew Benevolent Congregation Temple bombing • Baton Rouge bus boycott • Orangeburg massacre • Mansfield school desegregation incident • Bloody Monday (Danville)

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 180 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

The Positions section is in pretty sad shape: it only has a couple of random sentences. Conversely, the second paragraph in the lede is better: contains info that many readers consider important, even vital. Recently, User:Marquardtika removed quite a bit of text from the Positions section, reasoning that the sources were links to ACLU web site ... that was a valid decision. Perhaps the Position section could be defined as follows:

• Independent Source: Source must an independent RS (news sources, etc), not an ACLU document
• Current positions only: any source from, say, before 2000 is probably not acceptable for defining a current position of ACLU, unless position is a long-standing core position
• Relatively important positions: no need to clutter the section with obscure positions
• Terse summaries preferred: Additional detail can be lower in the body of the article, in appropriate section
• National vs State: Should only include positions of the national ACLU; state chapter positions should be included only if very noteworthy

Thoughts? Noleander (talk) 14:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since there appear to be no objections, I'll begin working on this task. Noleander (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making good progress on the Position section. Currently it is prose style. But it seems much more useful to readers to present it as bullet style (one bullet per position). For example:

* Voting Rights - Blah, Blah, .... <citation>

* Criminal Justice - Blah, Blah, .... <citation>

* Abortion - Blah, Blah, .... <citation>

Thoughts on using bullets for Position section (vs the prose that is in the article currently)? Noleander (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An IP editor has removed some sentences from the section American_Civil_Liberties_Union#Support_and_opposition ... not sure why, the sentences are all valid and sourced. The topic of the section is very noteworthy and of great interest to readers.

The purpose of the section is to present to readers: (a) some of the organizations/groups/people/factions that either support or oppose the ACLU; (b) some specific, noteworthy actions/policies of the ACLU that have drawn significant/noteworthy support or opposition; (c) To shed light on the perennial question of whether ACLU is liberal or conservative or both or neither.

Bear in mind that this article had some edit-warring many years ago in the Lead, debating if the ACLU should be labelled as "partisan" or "non-partisan", and one of the purposes of the "Support and Opposition" section is to forestall those kinds of wars, by providing readers with an informative, neutral summary of the "liberal vs conservative" question.

Note that the "History" section is huge, and is in the process of being moved into another article History of the American Civil Liberties Union (see Talk:American_Civil_Liberties_Union#"History"_section_vs_History_of_the_American_Civil_Liberties_Union_.._too_much_overlap? ) Therefore, moving content from any of the upper introductory sections (including "Support and Opposition" section ) into the History section, will probably cause the information to disappear from this main article in the future. Therefore, any important "overview" type info should stay in the upper sections (and not be put solely into the History section).

If someone wants to change the purpose and nature of the section, please discuss here first, before changing. Noleander (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, several months later. Same IP. Noleander (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cbls1911: why are you removing the sentence "The ACLU works to support the right to vote."? Noleander (talk) 23:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IP: the state affiliates are important. There are several good links, and many wikidata links. Also, the table is a "red link" style reminder to create articles for the affiliates.

Also: See Talk page section above about tagging the "Support & Opposse" as a "controversy" section, which it is not. Noleander (talk) 03:24, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]