This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject American Open Wheel Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of open wheelauto racing in the United States, with an emphasis on IndyCar racing, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American Open Wheel RacingWikipedia:WikiProject American Open Wheel RacingTemplate:WikiProject American Open Wheel RacingAmerican Open Wheel Racing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From a second read of the LEAD this morning, it appears that the 2024 was just the first event held, and that the Grand Prix is designed to be an annual championship, so will we see a 2025 $1 Million Challenge? Or is the 2024 simply a one-off event, and subsequent events by the GP are going to have a different title? TiggerJay(talk)17:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, there will not be a "2025 $1 Million Challenge", as the event has been renamed to "The Thermal Club IndyCar Grand Prix This years race will be called "2025 Thermal Club IndyCar Grand Prix." ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney"(hihi)17:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes; the golf tourney and the psychic demonstration challenge have WP:NATURAL disambiguation. If anything, the poker program (which lasted two seasons during the height of the poker-on-TV fad) could be better disambiguated with (poker). But I see no reason why the unique (NATURAL) use of "$1" (which was stable with a hatnote with the previous article at $1 Million Challenge) warrants a challenge on those grounds at this time. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney"(hihi)06:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, "$1 Million Challenge" was stable as an article title for a year with no issues. Redirecting to the DAB would cause linking issues as well that would require extra cleanup. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney"(hihi)17:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Googling for $1 Million Challenge, the overwhelming reliable results redirect to the Indycar race. Second as the Ghost of Dan Gurney said, $1 Million Challenge was stable until it was changed because IndyCar changed the designation. So we could do the move, although I don't see nothing wrong with lefting the article as it is. I've seen another designation like "Indycar $1 Million Challenge", both on media [1], local news [2] or in Indycar social media like their youtube channel.Rpo.castro (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is the talk page of what is effectively a child article that - if not for my heeding of WP:NOMERGE reason No. 1 - could otherwise be merged into the very parent article (The Thermal Club IndyCar Grand Prix) that you state was at the disputed name until recently. I don't know how I can make myself anymore clear on this point so that people stop misunderstanding this key element. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney"(hihi)06:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is splitting hairs... when the RM was raised it became a nomination, and gave you the opportunity to expand the rationale, which you have done, but still without providing any valid rationale in my opinion. Andrewa (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.