Reede, juuli 31, 2026

Ajalugu, Täna ajaloos

TÄNA AJALOOS, 11. juuli ⟩ Avati Tallinna teletorn

In the mathematical field of category theory, a subobject classifier is a special object of a category such that, informally, the subobjects of any object correspond to the morphisms from to . This provides an analogue of the set of Booleans in categories other than the category of sets.

The main use of subobject classifiers is in topos theory, where an elementary topos is defined as a category with a subobject classifier and certain additional requirements. In the internal language of an elementary topos, the subobject classifier is used to interpret truth values, hence the alternative name “object of truth values”.

Introduction

Let be a set. A subset can be equivalently described by its indicator function

Informally, subsets of can be identified with functions . A subobject classifier of a category is an object which plays a similar role as does in the category of sets: subobjects of an object can be identified with morphisms from to the subobject classifier. To recover the subset with indicator function in a “purely categorical way”, one can take a pullback

where the function from to is the inclusion map. Indeed, the subset , equipped with the inclusion map (and the unique, constant map ) is such a pullback because it has the correct universal property since a map into which gives the constant function 1 when composed with is the same as a map into .

Definition

Let be a finitely complete category (we denote the terminal object by ). A subobject classifier in is an object together with a monomorphism [a] such that every monomorphism is uniquely a pullback of .[1] This means that for every monomorphism , there exists a unique morphism , called the characteristic function or classifying map of , such that the following diagram is a pullback square (where denotes the unique morphism into the terminal object ):

A commutative diagram with morphisms ! : Y → 1, true : 1 ↪ Ω, ι : Y ↪ X and χ_ι : X → Ω

Equivalently (assuming is locally small), a subobject classifier is an object which represents the subobject functor . That is, there exists a bijection, natural in , between subobjects of and morphisms . When starting from this definition, one can recover the monomorphism as the subobject of corresponding to the morphism .[2]

Further examples

Sheaves of sets

The category of sheaves of sets on a topological space X has a subobject classifier Ω which can be described as follows: For any open set U of X, Ω(U) is the set of all open subsets of U. The terminal object is the sheaf 1 which assigns the singleton {*} to every open set U of X. The morphism η:1 → Ω is given by the family of maps ηU : 1(U) → Ω(U) defined by ηU(*)=U for every open set U of X. Given a sheaf F on X and a sub-sheaf j: GF, the classifying morphism χ j : F → Ω is given by the family of maps χ j,U : F(U) → Ω(U), where χ j,U(x) is the union of all open sets V of U such that the restriction of x to V (in the sense of sheaves) is contained in jV(G(V)).

Roughly speaking an assertion inside this topos is variably true or false, and its truth value from the viewpoint of an open subset U is the open subset of U where the assertion is true.

Presheaves

Given a small category , the category of presheaves (i.e. the functor category consisting of all contravariant functors from to ) has a subobject classifer given by the functor sending any to the set of sieves on . The classifying morphisms are constructed quite similarly to the ones in the sheaves-of-sets example above.

Elementary topoi

Both examples above are subsumed by the following general fact: every elementary topos, defined as a category with finite limits and power objects, necessarily has a subobject classifier.[3] The two examples above are Grothendieck topoi, and every Grothendieck topos is an elementary topos.

See also

  • Quasitopos, a type of category with a strong subobject classifier, which only classifies strong subobjects

Notes

  1. Every morphism out of the terminal object is automatically a monomorphism. This condition is included as a reminder that any pullback of will be a monomorphism.

Citations

  1. Mac Lane & Moerdijk 1992, p. 32.
  2. Mac Lane & Moerdijk 1992, p. 33.
  3. Pedicchio & Tholen (2004) p.8

References

Lisa kommentaar

Sinu e-postiaadressi ei avaldata. Nõutavad väljad on tähistatud *-ga