The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muhlach family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am revisiting this article as part of a failed bundled nomination of Filipino family articles created by User:Carl Francis. Since its creation, it is nothing more than a genealogy of the Muhlach family. In fact, it doesn't even try to explain the family's significance or importance. The "List of members" section contains a family tree that is mostly based on a diagram created by ABS-CBN. I suspect that original research or synthesis might be involved during the tree's creation, although I am not sure. Other than the family tree, there's only a very short lead section and a couple of references. EJPPhilippines (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philippines, Lists of people, and Actors and filmmakers. EJPPhilippines (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. While I suggested a Close during the last discussion per WP:TRAINWRECK, I do agree with the nom's reasoning on this particular article. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: WP:NOTGENEALOGY states that, "family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic." But this article functions merely as a family tree presentation and fails to demonstrate the notability or significance of the Muhlach family at least in a broader sense. This article is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. AstrooKai (Talk) 12:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.