The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. GringoInChile 09:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heretaunga College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unreferenced, poorly written substub ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 22:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Its bona fides. Keep it, it needs to be tidied up, say rewritten categorised scope_creep 23:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Cancel AfD Has there been any attempt to improve the article, to put in references? If these are the only reasons given to delete then there is no reason for this AfD, lets not waste our time!--Mike 23:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reason for this AFD is that the quality of this "article" is right around the level of unsalvageable crap. If you would like to improve it, then please go right ahead. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 23:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Salvaged, thanks grutness/truthbringer ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Piss-poor article, but verifiable and salvageable - I'll try to improve it a little. Grutness...wha? 23:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still not very good, but better than it was. Grutness...wha? 00:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Grutness...wha? 00:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for my usual reasons. -- Necrothesp 01:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems fine. --Limegreen 02:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep has a notable alumnus and staff. JoshuaZ 07:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep afd because it's a stub is absurd. 2nd schools are usually held to be notable. → bsnowball 16:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Most of our articles have humble beginnings, the subject is visibly notable. 05:56, 9 November 2006
• Keep per Grutness's improvements.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 06:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.