The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete and redirect to Adventist Health. Even after work was done, the concerns about the source quality (and thus notability, as notability hinges in large part on source quality per WP:SIGCOV) are unaddressed. Closing as "Delete and redirect" as both options have been floated here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:59, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adventist Health Hanford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable health centre; sourcing consists of a press-release and a brief listing on the website of the California Hospital Association. There's no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources that I'm able to see. I tried redirecting it, then proposed a merge, both have been reverted.

This is part of what appears to be an extensive programme of promotion of various non-notable units of Adventist Health carried out by a number of WP:COI editors. This may not be the only one of those that doesn't merit an article here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Because I'm trying to improve the hospital articles, but how can I do that if they are all deleted. Because of work done by past editors, who did a bad job.Catfurball (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I added sixteen independent references for Adventist Health Hanford. Making it a much better article. Catfurball (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- see WP:MERCY - Epinoia (talk) 20:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 18:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 18:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - references are not significant, "Adventist Yearbook," "Becker's Hospital Review," "Adventist World" and some minor newspapers - Adventist Health Hanford is covered in the Adventist Health article - not notable enough for a stand-alone article under WP:ORG - (in fact probably most or all of the separate articles for hospitals listed in Adventist Health should be deleted) - Epinoia (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- or Redirect to Adventist Health where it is already listed - Epinoia (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Epinoia: I added new references to Adventist Health Hanford. Like U. S. News & World Report; USA Today; Angie's List; The Business Journal; Blue Shield of California Foundation & ABC30.Catfurball (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- still pretty sketchy - not enough to satisgy WP:ORGSIG, "any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education." - Epinoia (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This looks like a run-of-the-mill hospital with nothing special about it. The sources are numerous, but of low-quality. I looked at two of the newly added sources in particular. US N&WR is just a directory listing. USA Today is just a database listing with the sorts of generic hospital-related stats you'd expect in a database. Fails WP:NCORP. I'm OK with a redirect, per WP:CHEAP. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.