Hello. You violated Wikipedia policy on three counts. "No own". "I don't like". And also you gave NO EXPLANATION for your rude obnoxious arrogant disrespectful reverts. Of decent modifications and wording changes. They were good faith modifications that you removed for no apparent reason, except you personally didn't like it. Which is against Wikipedia policy and drift. Do it again, get reverted again. Stop breaking Wikipedia rules. Thank you. 2603:7000:A900:45DF:8D98:2B37:4B41:F518 (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. My edits weren’t rude obnoxious arrogant and disrespectful! I was updating the page to show current president rather than last years. What does ‘no own’ and ‘I don’t like’ mean? Chillwinner1890 (talk) 17:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I add a source ? Chillwinner1890 (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My sentences talking about Diary of a Wimpy kid wasn't rude either and now I'm sent to this. I am confused as you are 82.18.235.86 (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions were unnecessary trivial information. Harryhenry1 (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you WhiteTailedEagle The thing is that one can see in the picture the poor boy is barefoot. That's the only word I added, "barefoot". Oh, hang on, an existing source on the page had that information. I have added that source at the end of the sentence now. (https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190827/p2a/00m/0fe/021000c)

Hello, how ya doin? I just wanna ask you a question. When you were reverting my edits on The Good Son article, how is it because we need to add a source, when other movies articles are the same way? Also, if you look at the reception section, it's all poor and plenty of people call mixed reception as poor too. Just sayin. ~2026-43412-0 (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~2026-43412-0, Per WP:V, it is Wikipedia policy that all claims added to Wikipedia are verifiable. — 🦅White-tailed eagle^{Talk to the eagle}Stalking eagle 19:53, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2029 Virginia Attorney General election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2029 Virginia Attorney General election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]