This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
I closely read this page (fixing minor grammatical errors as I went) and I found it to be balanced and informative in the best tradition of NPOV. My plaudits to the editors.
should this be mentioned under the section on popular culture? Apparently Mel Gibson used this poem intensively 2607:FEA8:FF01:4FA6:F555:CD12:DE56:C391 (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Criticism
This section should be written incorporating the criticisms made by Joachim Bouflet; instead, each item is followed by a purported rebuttal, written by an editor based solely on their opinion. I believe all these corrections should be removed so that the criticism section can fulfill its purpose: to express dissenting opinions. Gustavo Rubén (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]