Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Former featured article candidateThe Amazing Spider-Man 2 is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleThe Amazing Spider-Man 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 6, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 13, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

The redirect Spiderman 5 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 8 § Spiderman 5 until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wattsverse has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 11 § Wattsverse until a consensus is reached. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive antisemitism, needs to be removed immediately

The hyperlink for "goblin-like creature" links to the articles on Jews. This horrific racism needs to be changed immediately. Suggest linking it to the article on The Goblin comic book character, or else removing the hyperlink entirely. 96.248.109.81 (talk) 07:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it myself. Really messed up. 96.248.109.81 (talk) 07:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Critics

Hello! I just wanted to explain a recent edit. The content was original research, as the sources did not state that critics generally felt one way or another. The only source that did so was an article that only covered pre-release reviews and not a full spectrum of the reviews the film received once it was released. I have saved the sources in the Critical Response section. Please let me know if you have any questions. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 11:58, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]