Talk:List of actors who have played the Doctor

Other appearances

What is the point of the other appearances section? Wouldnt this information be out of scope for this page and be better for the page of each specific Doctor? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential FL?

OlifanofmrTennant given that you are the largest contributor to the article, would you like to try to make this an FL? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working off and on this article to make it an FL for about a year Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I'll help. Also, regarding your above question, I think "other appearances" should be kept- that way if the doctor appears in anything notable, this list will have the actor who portrayed them. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant and @DoctorWhoFan91, do you guys have any thoughts on the List of actors considered for the part of the Doctor article? I feel it's iffy on notability compared to this one, which at least has a valid split rationale. Given it is pretty closely associated with this one, I figured I'd ask about it here. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It would probably be kept- predictions for the next doctor are common, and some of the unbound doctors in this article actually turned down the doctor when they were first approached for it (saw this line on many of the actors when I searched them to look for refs) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: I believe the entries that I have separated into "The Doctor in other's bodies" are WP:OR- they only happen in small scenes in the audios mentioned? Do you think the criteria should be made more strict and they be removed? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A number of the audios in question have behind the scenes sections discussing the actors playing the Doctor, and at least one credits the actor in the closing credits (different from the credits given on Big Finish's site) (edit: I was mistaken about this bit). Namenamenamenamename (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ohh, I see, thanks! Any ideas where it can be found/under what name? DWF91 (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The behind the scenes/interviews are included as part of each audio release after the story, so wherever you can get the audios themselves. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well then someone would have to purchase all the audios in question. Which I’m guessing no one is willing to do which leads to the problem of vailed verification Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to find other, totally legitimate ways of accessing said information. DWF91 (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have or have access to copies of these as well. Does the actor playing the Doctor need to be mentioned non-narratively (audio credits, interviews section) or is narrative only sufficient? (character is played by so-and-so, at one point character is actually the Doctor, therefore actor plays Doctor) Namenamenamenamename (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Non-narrative would be better- references to the thing itself is not usually considered a good-quality source. DWF91 (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I don't have a copy of the extras for The Crumbling Magician, but out of the others Ghost in the Machine, The Widow's Assassin and Hearts of Darkness all at least mention the actors playing the Doctor in the audio (technically The Jigsaw War does as well but only in reference to him generally doing the Second Doctor in those audios, not to the specific scenario in the audio).
That being said. I know I'm the one who brought up the interviews but citing them may be too close to citing the stories themselves if we're avoiding that, since they're part of the same release. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think they’d be too close. It’s like citing BTS dvd extras or promotional interviews Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, won't be too close- I think the episode FAs for Doctor Who do have Confidential as reference and DWM too. So any BTS extras, or any Big Finish reports should be fine. DWF91 (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DoctorWhoFan91: if you can finish off the audio section then I would be willing to co-nominate it Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try looking for refs for them. DWF91 (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Billie Piper

The editing community has accepted mention of Billie Piper on the article The Doctor, based on extensive secondary sources saying Gatwa regenerated into Piper.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Why is any mention of Piper being removed here? While there is some uncertainty about exactly what it all means, this can be handled in the text, as done in The Doctor article. Bondegezou (talk) 13:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"The editing community" - where? There's zero conversation on this talk page, so if there's a conversation happening elsewhere that affects this article perhaps it would be prudent to link to it here... Apologies, my crystal ball isn't working. Also, please don't use bare URLs when you add content and use templates like Template:Cite web so that the citation is actually helpful to readers. Danners430 (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See talk:The Doctor#Follow secondary sources and all subsequent topics. DonQuixote (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, that’s helpful. I’ve honestly not got anything to add to the discussion that’s already taken place then (it’s all already been said), so no concerns from my side to having mention of BP - I’d just disagree with explicitly stating she is the 16th Doctor, as has already been discussed in the link above.
I would ask if @Bondegezou though - please format your cite correctly when you add it back in. Danners430 (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then shall I restore my edit, but tweak the text to note that uncertainty? Say, "Ncuti Gatwa is seen to regenerate into Billie Piper at the end of the story, although Piper's official role remains undisclosed."? Or you can change the text yourself. Bondegezou (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aye that sounds like it works - it addresses what we know based on what was in the episode and reasonably summarises the masses of speculation that’s going on everywhere… unless there’s other objections? Danners430 (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have made that edit then. Obviously, happy for further refinement of the explanatory text should anyone want to have a go. Bondegezou (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you even looked at Template:Cite Web? More importantly, have a read of WP:BURL while I tidy up your edit… Danners430 (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bondegezou (talk) 13:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]