This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Top-importance). Lists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disney High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Cinema High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).

Might be time to throw out the second sentence of the § Production cycle subsection? "Moving away from sequels" is clearly not the direction they've ended up taking, with sequels currently making up most of the announced slate, and sequels recently or soon being released for several of the specifically mentioned titles. 2A02:560:4D66:AA00:F5BF:3267:FD5C:8444 (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.

Dear IP user, there are two issues with your request, but I’ll start with the most obvious one: the lack of reliable sources in your request.
As it stands, your edit request risks being (at least partially) an editorial decision.
(To remove something not because we have reliable sources to replace the content, but because we think it should not be there) While that may be right, this is not what the edit request is for, because requests should be simple and uncontroversial.
Which brings me to the second issue: the edit you are requesting, due to not being overwhelmingly obvious and uncontroversial, could require first seeking consensus. I am asking you to fix at least one of these issues before reopening the request.
(You may add a clear description of a replacement, including reliable sources or you may first establish a consensus on the talk page and then come back to ask for your edit to be implemented, but preferably both)
Happy editing,
Slomo666 (talk) 20:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. My interpretation of "simple, non-controversial" does include common-sense decluttering along these lines. Obviously, the responding editors are free to disagree on a case-by-case basis. (Mostly, they don't, though, FWIW.)

- (OP) 2A02:560:4DA3:CB00:D11C:9EE8:55EC:4843 (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]