Talk:John J. Beckley
| John J. Beckley is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 21, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John J. Beckley, the first librarian of Congress, came to America as an indentured child servant? | |||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:John J. Beckley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Generalissima:, I will begin the review of this article in due time. Jon698 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- I made some edits to the lede to try to reduce its length and make it more a summary. Could you review it here and give me your opinions on it? Jon698 (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Jon698 The edits to the lede look good to me - thank you! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- I made some edits to the lede to try to reduce its length and make it more a summary. Could you review it here and give me your opinions on it? Jon698 (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- There are twelve sources within the Works Cited section. I have conducted a spot check of the following sources to check for accuracy: Pasley 1996 and Berkeley & Berkeley 1975. Sources [2] and [3] accurately cover his early life in the United Kingdom. Sources [9] and [10] cover his career in the early 1770s. [22] covers his career as mayor and his inability to rise in Virginia's social ranks. [18], [24], and [25] cover Madison and Randolph's views on Beckley's attempt to become secretary of the Constitutional Convention and the quote is correctly copied and attributed. [26] covers his attempt to become clerk of the U.S. House so that he could continue sending money to his parents. [30] covers his new found social advancement in New York and his relations with Jefferson and Madison. [33] covers his attempt to have George Clinton replace John Adams as vice president. [34] and [35] cover Beckley's views on the Jay Treaty and accusations of Wolcott overpaying Washington.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article covers his entire life, involvement in politics at the local, state, and federal levels, and his numerous clerical appointments.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I see no neutrality problems.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edits war on the page or significant changes.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- There are seven images in the article and all are public domain. I added an image of Alexander Hamilton due to his large role in the "Career under the Federalists" section.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- @Generalissima: I see nothing preventing this from becoming a good article. Jon698 (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- ... that John J. Beckley, the first Librarian of Congress, came to America as an indentured child servant?
- Source: Berkeley, Edmund S.; Berkeley, Dorothy S. (1975). "The First Librarian of Congress: John Beckley". The Quarterly Journal of the Library of Congress. 32 (2). JSTOR 29781617. pages 434–435
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 113 past nominations.
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:

- Long enough:

- Other problems:

Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:

- Neutral:

- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

- Other problems:

Hook eligibility:
- Cited:

- Interesting:

- Other problems:

| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I reviewed this article for its GA nomination. Everything is still is line and fine for DYK. However, I would like to propose this hook to you @Generalissima: "... that John J. Beckley, the first Librarian of Congress, leaked Alexander Hamilton's extramarital affair to the press? Jon698 (talk) 12:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
@Jon698: My apologies. This is a good review, but per WP:DYKRR you can't review a DYK nomination if you've reviewed it for GA, so this will need a second opinion. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
I think the hook is interesting enough and is well-cited, with reliable sources used. It also just passed GA and the user has done their QPQ, so passed.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 10:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

