This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Video games C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: YouTube Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject YouTube To-do: A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers New Jersey Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following are reference ideas for Hasan Piker. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: Korach, Natalie (2024-10-11). "Can Democrats Compete With the Rogan-verse?". Vanity Fair. "hasan-piker-twitch-joe-biden". WIRED. 2024. "visual-guide-to-influencers-shaping-2024-election". WIRED. 2024. "hasan-piker-liberal-voice-generation". GQ Middle East. 2024. "Ed Markey interview". cba.ca. 2024. "dnc-influencers-celebrities-content-creators-social-media". Politco. 2024. ""Vasemmiston Joe Rogan" haastaa kenet tahansa, ja chat villiintyy – Yritin ymmärtää Amerikan nuoria ja katsoin viikon ajan yhtä striimiä" (in Finnish). hs.fi. 2025. "A Progressive Mind in a Body Made for the 'Manosphere'". New York Times. 2025.

I admittedly I could only find a Newsweek source (I know I know) but how much weight if any should this have on the page if it gets more coverage? [[1]] I know we cannot "predict" coverage but a seven day ban if I am not mistaken is the longest ban he has ever had. Any thoughts? Agnieszka653 (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable for its own segment but stick it on the end of the 2025 segment that references multiple bans. Rambling Rambler (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any coverage in any notable RSs, either. It seems like, Twitch hasn't made a statement about the ban length or reason for it, either. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Asking how much weight it should be given "if it gets more coverage" is the opposite way to look at it. The weight can only be evaluated based on the sources so they need to come out first. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being one of Hasan's biggest (if not the biggest) controversy in Hasan's careear there is not one mention of the controversy here is a article from a reliable scource by wikipedia's standards

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/peta-responds-hasan-piker-dog-abuse-controversy-1236396303/

meta.wikimedia.org/hollywoodreporter.com Nik6942010 (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem a bit silly that such a big controversy is omitted from this article, but alas the RfC resulted in no consensus. — Czello ^(music) 08:17, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No. It’s an allegation with no evidence. We don’t deal in rumour-mongering. Rambling Rambler (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

its not rumor mongering there are reliable sources that have covered the story another one being

https://thehill.com/video/hasan-piker-accused-of-mistreating-dog-on-stream-with-shock-collar-denies-allegations-rising/11152442/ Nik6942010 (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is a rumour. It's an allegation with no evidence.

We don't add those to BLP unless there's an exceptionally good reason, and "people online claimed he did it" coverage isn't an exceptionally good reason. Rambling Rambler (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For additional info, there was an RFC about it. Talk:Hasan_Piker/Archive_4 ◦ Sibshops (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

When people look for the shock collar allegation they go to google and then they click whatever the fist link they find is, if it's not on Wikipedia they'll go to another site that covers it. It's better that they get their information from a well-balanced and fact checked source rather than something else.

That's why it's important to mention the allegations and also mention how they're just accusations. Nordinha (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to start another RfC as the recent one resulted in no consensus which defaults to excluding the content. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Update photo to photos taken at UBC conference. ~2026-10353-00 (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: If you would like the photo to be changed, please provide an image that complies with Wikipedia's image use policy. Day Creature (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Change "As of 2026, Piker is the 30th most subscribed channel on the streaming platform Twitch." to "Piker is among the most-watched political streamers on the platform Twitch, where his channel has millions of followers and regularly draws large audiences for live coverage of major political events."^[1] Akts2004 (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did you copy-paste the wrong source? It links to copyright.gov instead of a reliable source which makes this statement. ◦ Sibshops (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Someone tell me what this means because i have no clue Trade (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be a quote from one academic study, based on the reception section of the article. I don't think it really belongs in the lead, not least because it's quite confusing out of context. I'm going to remove it. Another sentence in the lead summing up his large cultural impact wouldn't be a bad thing I think but this one isn't very good. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]