Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vancouver: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vancouver/Archive 3. (BOT) |
→Peer review page update: Replying to Tom (LT) (using reply-link) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Cheers and hope you are well, [[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC) |
Cheers and hope you are well, [[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{u|Tom (LT)}}, Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for [[John Turner]]. [[User:Ktin|Ktin]] ([[User talk:Ktin|talk]]) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:23, 10 November 2020
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages
Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Category:Vancouver articles discussion
Feel free to contribute to this discussion: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_14#Category:Vancouver_articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- There was no consensus and therefore no change from that discussion.
- Now please see follow-up suggestions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 14 #WikiProject Vancouver. – Fayenatic London 10:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Peer review page update
Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (Wikipedia:WikiProject Vancouver/Peer review) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews.
The new instructions use Wikipedia's general peer review process (WP:PR) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too.
The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Wikipedia peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members.
I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{u|Tom (LT)}}) in your response.
Cheers and hope you are well, Tom (LT) (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Tom (LT), Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for John Turner. Ktin (talk) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

