This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Japan: History / Royalty & nobility High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the History task force. This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Women's History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives

Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 03:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fixing it.--T. Anthony 13:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, whoever edited this page so that she's an "Empress Regent", you're a dumbass. If she was a regent, she wouldn't be promoted to "Empress" because she was never a wife of an Emperor. If she was regent, she'd be Princess Regent.... Aye! 24.14.120.92 03:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

spotted a difference, English wikipedia says her first name was Toshiko, while German says had been Satoko.

en-wikipedia: "Before her accession to the Chrysanthemum Throne, her personal name was Toshiko (智子?).[3] Her initial pre-accession title was Isa-no-miya (以茶宮) and later Ake-no-miya (緋宮)." de-wikipedia: "Kaiserin Go-Sakuramachi (jap. 後桜町天皇, Go-Sakuramachi tennō; * 23. September 1740; † 24. Dezember 1813) war die 117. Kaiserin von Japan. Ihr Kindheitsname war Isanomiya, danach Akenomiya und ihr Eigenname Satoko (智子)." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.121.198 (talk) 20:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the picture caption "Empress Go-Sakuramachi (represented here as male with goatee)": I think this needs some explanation! I have to admit I am very curious why her artist would make her have a goatee... — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 10:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"This 18th-century sovereign was named after her father Emperor Sakuramachi and go- (後), translates as "later"; and thus, she could be called the "Later Sakuramachi". The Japanese word go has also been translated to mean the "second one;" and in some older sources, this empress might be identified as "Sakuramachi II"."

Can somebody provide a source for that? It rather reminds me of 武后. EnTerbury (talk) 20:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]