User talk:Aksi great: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Keegan (talk | contribs)
Teke's RfA thanks
Sarvagnya (talk | contribs)
3RR
Line 129: Line 129:


Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! [[User:Teke|<font color="maroon">Teke</font>]]<sup><small> ([[User talk:Teke|<font color="gray">talk</font>]])</small></sup> 17:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! [[User:Teke|<font color="maroon">Teke</font>]]<sup><small> ([[User talk:Teke|<font color="gray">talk</font>]])</small></sup> 17:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

I didnt think reverting vandalism was a violation of 3RR. I've seen people revert vandalism several times. [[User:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 19:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:09, 28 August 2006

Please click to leave me a new message.


Archive
Archives
  1. 3 December 2005 – 4 April 2006
  2. 4 April 2006 – 8 May 2006
  3. 8 May 2006 – 28 May 2006
  4. 28 May 2006 – 28 July 2006
  5. 29 July 2006 – 19 August 2006

My congratulations on the featured article!! Good job! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK05:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too. I hope you would have guessed my reasons for not participating in the FAC was because I was also a contributor to the page and my support could be considered "self-nom-by-proxy". Just a personal policy I have been maintaining for some time. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats... nice going -- Lost(talk) 09:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. I had only combined sections becoz by themselves they appeared too short and botched up becoz of picture formatting. Rama's arrow 16:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the regular Indian Wikipedians aren't editing much - all very busy, so INCOTW might as well go on hiatus. Still, I'll try to do what I can. Rama's arrow 16:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yo! Yeah congrats! and yes, its a pleasure that those coincided!! Now the wikiproject Indian cities has 8 FAs. Kochi should also be there soon. It's turning out to be a great productive project. --Dwaipayan (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Great job, Akash ! -- Samir धर्म 05:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations. And thanks for the cucumber as well. I couldn't say that I sought the job though...As for the future who knows...Blnguyen | rant-line 04:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on the Featured Article for Ahmedabad - you did a very good job.. --Rev.bayes 14:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I wonder when (or more likely if) one of these anon meatpuppets will actually put up a reason that's "valid", rather than the cruft we've seen so far! Tonywalton  | Talk 19:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I have a few things to do, like eat and go to the pub, but I'm sure our friends in the timezones west of the Atlantic will hold the fort! Tonywalton  | Talk 19:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 21st

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 34 21 August 2006 About the Signpost

Politician's staff criticizes Wikipedia after being caught editing it Board of Trustees elections continue with call for candidates
Report from the Swedish Wikipedia News and notes
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs and Internal Operational News The Report On Lengthy Litigation

Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Now that Ahmedabad has been promoted (thanks to you), I think its time for Gandhinagar. That way, we will have two cities from Gujarat, that have been promoted to featured status. What say you? --Nearly Headless Nick 06:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

checkout the nadiad page

checkout the Nadiad page, have made some changes. location based on the falling rain website. tell me what more can be done.

File:Scarlettanager99.jpg Hello, Aksi, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 72/1/0, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I'll be tentative with the new buttons for a while, and certainly welcome any and all feedback on how I might be able to use them to help the project. All the best, and thanks again! — Deville (Talk) 03:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Hope the exams went well (but sure they did) -- Samir धर्म 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Surprise!

I =Nichalp «Talk»=, award you this barnstar for your contributions to India-related content. Enjoy! =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC) (barnstar shifted to user page)[reply]

SAC

Hi Akash,

The criteria is nearly the same, though we prefer to be not so picky, or we will be starved for SAs. The requirement is that Portals should only feature "High quality" content. This doesn't imply FA status. If you can critically analyse and suggest improvements during the SAC, do it. Just make sure they are actionable enough in the time frame. Scrutinizing wouldn't hurt as you'd have to do it anyway during/just before the FAC. As an example, I went ahead and copyedited the Thiruvananthapuram article to FA standards. There are a few prose related issues left, that can be sorted out before/during the FAC. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

I was under the impressions that those kind of tags are on talk page only, and detract from the main article. But if Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/INCOTW allows it, I guess I can't object Mad Jack 19:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You redirected MY Friends Episode List

Ok, this is my page, how about you DON'T redirect my Friends Episode List. So if you wouldn't mind, you can undirect it back to my page THANKS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Led Zeppelin Rules‎ (talk • contribs) .

NOTICE: Aobut you ruining my Friends list.

Thanks for redirecting (which is another word for deleting) my Friends list, so I have took the liberty of deleting the link from my page...I'll make a new one soon, and seeing as you have YOUR friends episode list, you'd let me have MINE. -Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Led Zeppelin Rules‎ (talk • contribs) .

Wow

You're attracting some weird messages now [1]. Means you're doing a good job! -- Samir धर्म 11:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hehehehe

Really weird this... I doubt he was trying to impersonate me, for he was editing pages I didn't even know existed. Anyway, thanks for informing me. Rama's arrow 13:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Teke's RfA thanks

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I didnt think reverting vandalism was a violation of 3RR. I've seen people revert vandalism several times. Sarvagnya 19:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]