Wikipedia talk:Notability (music): Difference between revisions
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 30d) to Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)/Archive 15. |
let me know |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please take some time to comment at [[Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song)#How_is_iTunes_messed_up]]. Thanks — [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please take some time to comment at [[Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song)#How_is_iTunes_messed_up]]. Thanks — [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
== NSONG == |
|||
[[WP:NSONG]] is very difficult to read a glance and its prose is meshed into two separate ideas. The guidelines are very ambiguous and seem to warn editors over circumstances than providing clear criteria to warrant any outline for inclusion. It also contains some very instructions for A9 for which there is already criteria. I know policies usually don't reference each other but it seems traditional songs tend to be a common problem. Could I propose the following changes and format (if this is the right place for this discussion): |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
! Version 1 |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
For songs<ref group=note name=most>Whether an artefact of [[Wikipedia:Recentism|recentism]] or otherwise, most song articles on Wikipedia are for modern (20th or 21st century) popular music songs. A minority of song articles refer to ones that are not modern popular music songs, that weren't published in albums, that aren't part of one specific discography, and that in some cases even lack identifiable authors or performers. Redirection of such song titles if they are non-notable has thus to be to some other, appropriate target. However, many such songs, ''within'' that specific category, are notable and have long-documented histories of their origins, spread, performances, meanings, and lyrical variations. See "[[Oh Dear! What Can the Matter Be?]]", for example.</ref>: |
|||
# Has been been ranked on national or significant music charts. |
|||
# Has won one or more significant awards or honors. |
|||
# Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups. |
|||
# Has been the direct focus of several notable publications where music is not their primary focus. |
|||
''Note: Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song.'' |
|||
For traditional songs (as well as tunes): |
|||
# Must avoid [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:ORIGINALSYN]]. |
|||
''Note: Sources should always be added for any lore, history or passed on secondary content. Wikiversity and WikiBooks have different policies and may be more appropriate venues.'' |
|||
|} |
|||
Revision as of 10:06, 15 December 2012
Discussion about the treatment of EPs in chronologies
See Talk:Hurt:_The_EP#Chronology. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Songs v. Singles
Can some clarification be included in the guidelines to differentiate songs from singles? At the moment singles need to meet WP:GNG requirements, while songs need only to be "ranked on national or significant music charts". Numerous AfD's are using this clause to write articles on tracks off albums, which have not been released as singles but (via I-tunes or other download sites) have charted all the same. It would seem to make more sense to me that officially released singles have more chance of being 'notable' than unofficially released tracks. Sionk (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Clarify what "composition" means
In the WP:COMPOSER #1 "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.", what does "composition" stand for? Does this mean musical composition or does any media suffice -- theater, film, video game, etc.? As a side question, what does "notable" stand for -- Wikipedia's notability? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- How is music written for "theater, film, video game, etc." not compositions? ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 01:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- So the wording should be "notable musical composition" (irregardless if it is or is not a part of some bigger media), not just "composition", right? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think what Melodia is saying is that "composition" refers to all music created, regardless of media. I concur. However, please note that just because a particular game or movie is notable, this does not mean that the soundtrack is notable. Notability is not inherited. LK (talk) 04:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's pretty much how I interpreted that. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think what Melodia is saying is that "composition" refers to all music created, regardless of media. I concur. However, please note that just because a particular game or movie is notable, this does not mean that the soundtrack is notable. Notability is not inherited. LK (talk) 04:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I was puzzling over what kind of non-musical composition might be at issue in your question, trying to read between the lines. Perhaps you were thinking of something like the spoken dialogue in the book of a musical play or movie? Anyhow, LK's hit the mark. The GNG is clear, and to be verifiably notable, there must be a RS that has already taken note. (I've always thought that wp:Notability should be called wp:Noted, it would be much less confusing to newbies). LeadSongDog come howl! 15:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to stay pretty neutral with my question, but the AfD that prompted me to clarify is here. To me GNG is also clear, but this clause makes it seem like composing for any composition (musical or otherwise) would make one notable. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Notability of tours
Hi. I'm seeking input on a few articles about tours that I believe fail WP:NCONCERT. I also have a few concerns regarding the content of them (see here for example). These are both created by the same user who has a history of similar articles and content. I've had little success getting him to collaborate or follow policy and guidelines, so second opinions and input would be much appreciated. Articles are;
Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
RFC about iTunes as a source for release histories
Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please take some time to comment at Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song)#How_is_iTunes_messed_up. Thanks — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
NSONG
WP:NSONG is very difficult to read a glance and its prose is meshed into two separate ideas. The guidelines are very ambiguous and seem to warn editors over circumstances than providing clear criteria to warrant any outline for inclusion. It also contains some very instructions for A9 for which there is already criteria. I know policies usually don't reference each other but it seems traditional songs tend to be a common problem. Could I propose the following changes and format (if this is the right place for this discussion):
| Version 1 |
|---|
|
For songs[note 1]:
Note: Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. For traditional songs (as well as tunes):
Note: Sources should always be added for any lore, history or passed on secondary content. Wikiversity and WikiBooks have different policies and may be more appropriate venues. |
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).