This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group. Comics: DC Comics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

To whom it may concern (including IP address 64.236.243.16, whose participation in this discussion given that his edits are the point of this discussion),

This is a discussion dedicated to correcting what someone who may have a conflict of interest in editing have said are errors about the show on this article while still following Wikipedian policies and guidelines. 64.236.243.16, self-reportedly Greg Weisman, has been editing this article with the intention of correcting errors. However, because is drawing on personal knowledge without citing any verifiable, reliable sources, which is not allowed on Wikipedia, I have reverted these good-faith edits. While professional expertise is always welcomed on Wikipedia and citing oneself is allowed, the sources cited by the professional must be verifiable. I recommend that Greg Weisman either:

a) (IMHO, the better one) alerts the sources we have cited (i.e. reliable online news organizations) that the information they have is incorrect, thus allowing us to correct the errors while being able to cite verifiable/reliable sources
b) (more iffy* solution) edits his own website (i.e. Ask Greg) to clear up/correct errors he sees on the internet

• Solution #b is considered a little more iffy, because the usage of self-published sources is generally not acceptable, with the exception that "the self-published material produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications," which, I think, Ask Greg could qualify, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Ask Greg is a section whose words are penned by Weisman on a third-party site, which seems to similar to how an expert has his own column on a newspaper. —Mirlen^Talk 06:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also open to alternative proposals (as there is definitely a precedent for this sort of issue) suggested by other editors, hence this discussion. —Mirlen^Talk 01:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the verifiable or grammatical edits by 64.236.243.16. For convenience, I have listed out the restored edits: Artemis's age, which is indeed 15 according to the official podcast (verified); per season --> throughout each season (grammar-related edit noted); and Jackson Hyde's background specifically originating from Brightest Day as stated in official DCU blog (verified). Other edits still remain unrestored, since they need to be cited by verifiable, reliable sources w/o drawing on personal knowledge from a shared IP address. —Mirlen^Talk 03:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence saying "Superboy, whose origins will be faithful to that of his comic book counterpart while the character in the show will be a new take by the producers" How can it be both faithful to his comic counterpart but be a new take?68.196.93.32 (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems very clear to me. The origin story is faithful to the comics, but the character's personality is a new take. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There has yet to be a wiki for this program, there's a wealth of articles that could be done even from the first two episodes. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may have skipped over Young Justice (TV series).-5- (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't one on wikia. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now I understand.-5- (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]