Talk:Richard Nixon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 169699135 by Bart Versieck (talk)
Important addition
Line 5: Line 5:
|2={{Project Congress|class=B|importance=High|subject=Person}}
|2={{Project Congress|class=B|importance=High|subject=Person}}
|3={{WPBiography|living=no|class=B|priority=High|politician-work-group=yes|military-work-group=yes}}
|3={{WPBiography|living=no|class=B|priority=High|politician-work-group=yes|military-work-group=yes}}
|4={{WP1.0|class=B|WPCD=yes}}
|4={{WP1.0|class=B|importance=High|WPCD=yes}}
}}
}}



Revision as of 22:19, 6 November 2007

Removal of miscellaneous section

The extremely long miscellaneous section must be removed. Trivia sections are highly discouraged on Wikipedia, and this extremely long one has to go. There is no point to it! yeah, some of the cited information can be integrated in to the correct sections in the article, but the majority is, for lack of a better word, trivia. This is probably the reason it failed a GA review; GA's definetly shoulnd't have trivia sections - especially one as long as this. I tried removing it, but was reverted. I am going to integrate some of it into the article though. I'll keep the section for now, but it has to go. Happyme22 00:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it should go. The miscellaneous/trivia section is mostly just a junk bin of pointless factoids. Plazak 04:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also do agree. Extremely sexy 15:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]