Talk:List of Masonic buildings: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Brosi (talk | contribs)
removed link
 
This needs to go....
Line 3: Line 3:
[[User:Brosi|Brosi]] 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)* [http://www.olathemasoniclodge.org/ Olathe #19], Olathe, Kansas.
[[User:Brosi|Brosi]] 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)* [http://www.olathemasoniclodge.org/ Olathe #19], Olathe, Kansas.
This is an interesting link that should go on [[lodges]] not here. This is for architecture and architectural history of the temples only.[[User:Brosi|Brosi]] 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an interesting link that should go on [[lodges]] not here. This is for architecture and architectural history of the temples only.[[User:Brosi|Brosi]] 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

== This needs to go.... ==

This is going to turn into a list of random information. If these buildings are notable in and of themselves, and there are decent articles on them, just make a subcategory for them under Freemasonry (Masonic Buildings, maybe?), add the articles directly, and get rid of this list. [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] 04:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:31, 27 January 2007

Brosi 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)* Olathe #19, Olathe, Kansas. This is an interesting link that should go on lodges not here. This is for architecture and architectural history of the temples only.Brosi 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to go....

This is going to turn into a list of random information. If these buildings are notable in and of themselves, and there are decent articles on them, just make a subcategory for them under Freemasonry (Masonic Buildings, maybe?), add the articles directly, and get rid of this list. MSJapan 04:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]