Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krav maga in popular culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Krav Maga in popular culture may be considered at AfD seperately. Hut 8.5 16:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Krav maga in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review 5th May 2010, User:Jmcw37 as secretary.
WP:NRVE Wikipedia:WPMA/N "No reliable sources found to verify notability" jmcw (talk) 11:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you proceed and delete it. There is another identical article about this subject. Krav Maga in popular culture This article includes references and it is almost identical with the article nominated for deletion. --Der rikkk (talk) 11:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Der_rikkk is the article's creator and only substantial contributor, so I've suggested that he apply a WP:CSD#G7 tag to the article. It looks like he created Krav maga in popular culture with incorrect caps in the title, and then created a near-identical, correctly capitalized copy at Krav Maga in popular culture. I'd normally just convert the erroneously-titled version into a redirect, but since the AfD's underway I thought I'd discuss first. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.k. I pasted the tag in the article. When I created the article I was new to Wikipedia and I wasn't 100% sure what I was doing so I accidentally created the same article twice. So if one can be deleted that would be great. Thank you --Der rikkk (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.