User talk:GraceSophie09
Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc-Christian Riebe (April 1)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
The comment they left was:
Peacock language like "making the news", and "limelight" from the very first paragraph need to go. The last sentence in the lead is pure PR speak. Such things need to go. We need something written neutrally.
The rest of the article has potential. However, promotional spin like "many article", "tracking down more than 2000 openings" needs to be cleaned up. Either write down one or two notable examples or don'T mention it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marc-Christian Riebe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! GraceSophie09,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc-Christian Riebe (April 1)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marc-Christian Riebe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Note: Unregistered users cannot review AfC submissions. Your submission has not been reviewed. This template was probably posted in error. Happy Squirrel (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buhram. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)