Hi Artem S. Tashkinov,

This message is in addition to the important update email I have sent you. I think I have noticed you removing "Common features:" from the Cannon Lake article where it listed only one SKU. I am fine with that, but I'll explain that the reason for why I wrote it like that, is, consistency between various different CPU product listings. You see, my goal was to achieve a uniform look across those listing tables. So even if there's only one model, it says "Common features" much like how the other CPU series listings are presented. Hope that makes sense to you. But, I'll be leaving all this up to you from now on, as like I said in that email, I don't have the time to discuss and decide on sweeping changes these days anymore.

P.S.: this is what the Ryzen 8000G series APUs listing template looked like when I created it, I don't quite like how it looks now with all the extra columns added to the table. The Zen 4 + Zen 4c cores were already indicated in the "core config" column, where you can see in the footnote if it says "n + n", then that's Zen 4 and Zen 4c cores respectively. Also, Ryzen 8040 series mobile processors listing template then and now.

I usually only add columns to a table if there's a major architectural feature addition and the info varies across the models (e.g. E-cores on intel CPUs, the NPU).

That's all from me at this time.

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought about the wording and it sounded redundant for a single CPU in the lineup. I've reverted the change anyways. It now looks kinda awkward but I didn't mean want to upset you or alter anything. @AP 499D25 Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The change was okay, I wasn't requesting a revert, just writing down why it was there (and noting edits to other tables breaking consistency while at it). — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On the Edge (Andy Duguid album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Edge (Andy Duguid album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Andy Duguid - On The Edge (album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On four separate occassions in the same article (GeForce RTX 50 series), I've fixed auto-generated author names in cite templates you've added. I'd hope you'd preview your changes and spot any obvious mistakes in the cite templates (particularly author names), before publishing changes.

Your edit Special:Diff/1276000694

Fixed by Special:Diff/1276001593

Your edit Special:Diff/1276962872

Fixed by Special:Diff/1277059389

Your edit Special:Diff/1275318453

Fixed by Special:Diff/1275355496

Your edit Special:Diff/1283919843

Fixed by Special:Diff/1284008177

84.250.15.152 (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artem S. Tashkinov. Thank you for your work on GPMI. Another editor, Fuzheado, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the page and adding relevant templates.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fuzheado}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Fuzheado | Talk 16:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The BOLD indicates that you should discuss any changes which have been reverted rather than edit warring. Attempting to correspond with Tga.D by edit summary is not sufficient or acceptable.

With respect to your edits to Signal (software) your edit summary states "The linked WP page EXPLICITLY INCLUDES SIGNAL. What else do I need to specify? Maybe you could actually check what you are reverting" which disingenuously skips over the fact that "the linked WP page" was altered by you based on a misrepresentation of the source you cite - 100M downloads is not 100M active users.

Furthermore you should not cite Wikipedia as a source. Cabayi (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The removal from the Signal messenger article and the edit to the social networks with over 100 million users page both seemed unwarranted, especially given that Signal had been included in the article for many many months. I'm not interested in debating such drastic changes. Since the editor who made them chose not to provide any rationale and you appear to be defending their position, I'll simply step back. Thank you. And no — I have no intention of engaging in an edit war. That was never my goal. I misjudged the other editor, clearly. My mistake. Enjoy your WP. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be under the impression that this is due to some sort of anti-Signal bias. I can assure you that's not the issue here, and would point to the fact I've contributed code to Signal a number of times, and wrote an entire chapter of my PhD thesis on it. I saw your edit, and was surprised, since when I published that research (a year and change ago), the most accurate sources at the time listed Signal as having approximately 40 million MAU, so I wanted to see what happened that made it grow so quickly since. As was pointed out, installs are not reflective of MAU, so can't be used as a source here (I've installed Signal many times, including on several phones at once, but I am only one active user; I've also met plenty of people who tried Signal/Text Secure once, then never used it again). Since I didn't see any reputable sources for the claim, I reverted both the change on the Signal article, and removed it from the list it linked to. The reason I didn't go into detail is that the lack of a citation seemed clear, I assumed it would be easily be remedied if I was wrong, and that my edits would be taken in good faith. I'm also not interested in an edit war, and would be happy to find out Signal had reached that milestone, so if you have a source, I'm totally fine adding both back. Tga (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the exchange, it's clear that the current editorial norms around the article differ from how I prefer to contribute. I'm stepping back and will leave future decisions to those more invested in maintaining the existing approach. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 11:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page GeForce RTX 50 series, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]