Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Twistedmath. I noticed that you recently removed content from SummerSlam (2025) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. twisted. (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:LISTN, you need coverage of the subject as a whole to establish notability for the whole grouping of characters. No sources illustrate notability as a set. While WP:SIZESPLIT is a viable rationale, that should be established only after consensus on the talk page, especially since the current article's section is not unwieldy enough that the split is a unanimous assumption. Overall, this is pretty well put together as an article. Get some sources discussing this overall and I think its got a good shot at meeting notability. Also, minor note, but make sure to fix those citation errors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of The Apothecary Diaries characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 12:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 184.144.90.165! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 12:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All that has changed since last time is a single source that is discussing only one character, and not all of them as a set. I hate to decline this again so soon after last time, but this article needs some actual WP:SIGCOV discussing the *characters* as a set, not just one individually (I.e, something like "Why the Characters of the Apothecary Diaries are Amazing" vs "Why Main Character of the Apothecary Diaries is Amazing")

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of The Apothecary Diaries characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 17:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 19:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Usos are not an active tag team. Do not vandalise the article again. Lemonademan22 (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 184.144.90.165. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of The Apothecary Diaries characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]