This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Spain This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

This article was created with direct reference to the original 1602 edition of República Mista by Tomás Fernández de Medrano. The treatise itself, written in Early Modern Spanish and Latin, serves as the primary source for this article. A modern critical analysis has been incorporated under its own heading.

Where appropriate, translated excerpts are included to preserve the tone and intent of the author while adhering to Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and accessibility. Additional sections—such as the dedication to the Duke of Lerma, the summary of the Duke of Savoy’s oration, the treatise’s philosophical structure, and its publication history—were introduced to provide historical and thematic context.

This article aims to present a rare and understudied early modern treatise in a clear, structured, and accessible format for the first time. Feedback and contributions are welcome to further improve its clarity and sourcing. The Royal Herald (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Great article. Refs need some cleanup. Maybe convert to sfn tags if your submitting it to WP:GA.

scope_creepTalk 16:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve done a full cleanup of the citations and brought the article up to a consistent standard, including converting to sfn where appropriate. If you happen to be interested, I’d really welcome your thoughts on whether the article might now be ready for a Good Article nomination—or if you’d consider supporting or reviewing it when the time comes.

No pressure at all, I thought I’d ask since your feedback has already been very helpful. Thanks for your suggestion and review! The Royal Herald (talk) 13:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is the longest article word-count wise TheSqueakyOtter (talk) 20:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article was substantially reduced and reorganized to remove redundancy, and improve clarity, while preserving all encyclopedically relevant content. The Royal Herald (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]