This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Aviation: Biography This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article is supported by the aerospace biography project. Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

As stated at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Adding individual items to a list:-

1. All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
2. Every entry should meet the notability criteria for its own article. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the list, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future. This prevents indiscriminate lists, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
3. Editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
4. All items on the list must follow Wikipedia's core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view

All redlinks, without a verifiable citation, should be removed and those with a citation should only remain if "it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming".
As this will delete almost the entire list, I suggest allowing say 2 months for citations to be added, before deleting the entries without.
As it is almost impossible to assess whether "it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming" I suggest we "choose to limit the list to entries with a Wikipedia articles", and eliminate all redlinks - as point 3 above - but that, unlike deleting the entries without citations, is a matter for consensus. Does anyone object?
- Arjayay (talk) 11:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up waiting 3 years before deleting the entries without artilces or references - Arjayay (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]