Talk:Kellyanne Conway

Semi-protected edit request on 15 September 2023

After Trump's inauguration, Conway was embroiled in a series of controversies: using the phrase "alternative facts" to describe fictitious and disproven attendance numbers for Trump's inauguration

Please edit the word "fictitious" in the above sentence. There is no evidence or notation that the subject is fictitious. This seems to be an opinion of the editor. Thank you. 47.215.135.139 (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the sources at Kellyanne_Conway#"Alternative_facts"? Do any of them meet your criteria? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2024 Kellyanne Conway year abroad at Oxford University.

SHOULD BE IN Early Life NOT IN Career

While a student at Trinity College, on her undergraduate junior year studying abroad at University of Oxford, as a foreign exchange student, she met Boris Johnson and became friends with Frank Luntz.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2017-03-09/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-kellyanne-conway

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/kellyannes-alternative-universe/517821/

https://www.thetimes.com/article/kellyanne-conway-trump-was-a-great-girl-boss-gzxpmz0bm

https://www.c-span.org/video/?199905-9/future-republican-party

BLUEBERRY PICKING, ADD

Piece work

69.181.17.113 (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. You seem to be requesting that the statement be moved, but what is BLUEBERRY PICKING, ADD Piece work supposed to mean? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 07:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2024

Please change the infobox 'spouse' parameter to reflect Kellyanne Conway#Personal_life (as with George Conway) from:

end=separated

to:

end=divorced

Ta, 130.44.133.157 (talk) 14:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, see Kellyanne Conway#Personal_life; the infobox contradicts the article's already-cited statement that "In March 2023, George and Kellyanne announced that they were divorcing after 22 years of marriage." Or if the objection regards updating the existing citation,
Levin, Bess (April 3, 2024). "Kellyanne Conway's Ex-Husband Makes Nearly $1 Million Donation to Get Joe Biden Reelected". Vanity Fair.
ought to suffice. 130.44.133.157 (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is that the March 2023 announcement was that they "were divorcing", not that the divorce is final. Vanity Fair says he and Kellyanne announced their decision to divorce, but also does not say that it's final. A headline isn't verification. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing revert on one of Marquardtika's edits concerning Claudia Conway.

Specifically the one here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kellyanne_Conway&diff=prev&oldid=1308493790)

Which wholly removes the content on Claudia saying her mother is abusive, Kellyanne's twitter account then posting a photo of her daughter topless, and the beginning of a police investigation.

In August 2020, Claudia Conway announced she was seeking emancipation.[147] In January 2021, she claimed that her mother has been "physically, mentally, and emotionally abusive," posting videos on TikTok appearing to show her mother screaming at and even once hitting her.[148] On January 25, 2021, Kellyanne Conway's official Twitter account shared a topless photo of a girl later confirmed to be Claudia Conway.[149] New Jersey police launched an investigation into the matter.[150] At age 16, Claudia Conway appeared as a contestant on, but was eliminated from, American Idol.[151]

It replaces this with

Claudia and Kellyanne were once estranged but had reconciled as of 2024.[147]

This to me feels like an great oversimplification, at best. Made more odd because consensus was established on this exact wording when text concerning the situation was originally added. Talk:Kellyanne Conway/Archive 1#Claudia Conway topless picture controversy


Were I able to I'd revert them myself, but I can't due to only having 9 edits, and making one more just to hit the threshold feels shady. So in accordance with Wikipedia:Edit requests proposing the change here first before adding a formal request. AVeryBigHat (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Marquardtika if you wish to comment. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The content I removed felt too in the weeds, especially given that they have reconciled. Claudia was a minor and is not notable in her own right, so I believe WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE applies. AFAICT nothing ever came of any police investigation. This article is about Kellyanne and shouldn't be a WP:COATRACK for content about Claudia. I'm open to alternative versions of the content, though, if anyone wants to suggest them. Marquardtika (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]