This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Transport Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City: Public Transportation Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

@Epicgenius: Do you think it makes sense to have a section noting the mitigation commitments made by the MTA, given all the attention, given to the issue? It also might be worth noting some of the findings of the Environmental Assessment and the FONSI.

In terms of other things to cover, toll shopping should be mentioned. There are likely others. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613, probably. On the other hand, it is looking more and more likely that we will have to split the page at some point, just so we can accommodate this new info (the article had 48,000 characters of prose last July, but now is 68,000+ characters). Great work on the additions by the way. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on a split-history should probably be split off. There is still remarkably more to add about the recent (2021-present) period on the program, including snags in the environmental review process, additional bus service, a few more details on exemptions, more on the MoveNY plan, etc., let alone the mitigations/EA findings. More is needed on the late 1970s plan that was kiboshed (I know where sources are). The post-9/11 HOV limits should probably be added, along with other similar initiatives. I do wonder if it would be worth mentioning that New York's push has lead cities like SF, LA, and Boston to consider it. There is also some insane stuff I know that I hope becomes public at some point. Thanks. Your work on this article has been amazing. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As the tin says. We need to WP:DENY. -1ctinus📝🗨 22:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]