Kirsten Gillibrand has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 7, 2006 Articles for deletion Deleted October 22, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). United States: Dartmouth / Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance). New York (state): Capital District / Hudson Valley Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Capital District (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as High-importance). Women's History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why Lu Tianna redirects here? Not in article. Delete? - Altenmann >talk 15:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Lu Tianna has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2 § Lu Tianna until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update 2024 election under U.S. Senate to include election results and changing to past tense Oneggs (talk) 02:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I did a very bare-bones update, but at least it's current. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The current list of people calling for Gillibrand's resignation only includes Mehdi Hasan, who is a journalist. The elected officials calling for her resignation should also be referenced. I don't know everyone who's called for it, but two NY electeds I've seen:

NY State Senator Jabari Brisport calls her comments "absolutely disgusting, racist, and defamatory" and also calls on her to resign.

https://x.com/JabariBrisport/status/1938418007102869884

NY Assemblywoman Claire Valdez likewise calls for her to resign, saying that Sen. Gillabrand "needs to represent all New Yorkers. Since her racist spiral proves she can’t do that, she should resign."

https://x.com/claireforqueens/status/1938366083364491410

Here's a mockup of what the insert would look like (it could be shortened. I imagine the list will eventually get unweildy if more calls keep rolling in)

Gillibrand has also faced calls to resign in the wake of this incident, including from Mehdi Hasan, who stated "I think [Gillibrand] should resign for falsely smearing Zohran Mamdani as a terrorist",,^[1] New York State Senator Jabari Brisport, who called her comments "absolutely disgusting, racist, and defamatory", saying "She should resign",^[2] and New York Assemblywoman Claire Valdez, who said that Sen. Gillabrand "needs to represent all New Yorkers. Since her racist spiral proves she can’t do that, she should resign."^[3]

2600:4040:7FB4:9900:645B:7804:F0D0:AF77 (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Per WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTNEWS. We don't need to quote every politician's response on social media; wait for reliable secondary sources to cover the controversy. Day Creature (talk) 18:46, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surely even adding something as minimal as, like:

Gillibrand has also faced calls to resign in the wake of this incident, including journalist Mehdi Hasan, who stated "I think [Gillibrand] should resign for falsely smearing Zohran Mamdani as a terrorist", as well as some New York elected officials.

wouldn't go amiss, since it's odd to only include or mention a journalist when multiple NY electeds have called for her resignation. 2600:4040:7FB4:9900:645B:7804:F0D0:AF77 (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are there reliable secondary sources that have covered the elected officials calling for her resignation? The paragraph in general needs much better sourcing. Day Creature (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if formatting or protocol is incorrect; I am a new editor.

The passages describing Sen. Gillibrand’s statements on the Brian Lehrer show (under the subheading ‘Accusations of Islamophobia’) contain some imprecise language. Lehrer is misspelled ‘Leher,’ for example. The Senator called on Mamdani to ‘denounce’ rather than ‘refute’ the term ‘intifada.’ (If a paraphrase is called for, ‘repudiate’ is a better fit than ‘refute’).

But most crucially: although that same term — ‘intifada’ — remains the principal target of Gillibrand’s statements, the specific statement for which she was accused of islamophobia is the one in which she falsely suggested that Mamdani had advocated ‘global jihad.’ Responding to a caller, the Senator made reference to New York constituents alarmed at Mr. Mamdani’s candidacy (despite the fact that the collar in question was not, in fact, a New York constituent, but instead a resident of Jersey City, New Jersey). Senator Gillibrand said, “The caller is exactly the New York constituents that I’ve spoken to that are alarmed. They are alarmed by [Mamdani’s] past public statements. They are alarmed by past positions, particularly references to global jihad.” In fact, Mr. Mamdani has declined to denounce ‘global intifada,’ not ‘global jihad.’ It is Senator Gillibrand who supplied the latter, more inflammatory term, leading to accusations of islamophobic bigotry. She amplified the error by further suggesting, “This is a very serious issue because people that glorify the slaughter of Jews, create fear in our communities.” The Senator did not offer any evidence that the Democratic mayoral candidate has ever ‘glorified’ such ‘slaughter,’ and there is no reason to believe any such evidence exists.

All quotations above taken from the Brian Lehrer Show transcript: https://www.wnyc.org/story/call-your-senator-sen-gillibrand-on-trumps-big-beautiful-betrayal-mamdanis-victory-and-more/ EyeofBalor (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the text in that subsection was just original research, so I removed it. The "global jihad" bit is in there now, with a source. WP:RS/P lists Rolling Stone as generally unreliable for modern politics, but in this case the article is straightforwardly reporting remarks from the episode, and it happens in this case that this is the publication that followed up with Gillibrand's office to get the "misspoke" explanation. Einsof (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so much better. The section is vastly improved now, thank you. EyeofBalor (talk) 21:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]