Talk:His Majesty's Naval Service: Difference between revisions
→History of the term "Her Majesty's Naval Service": status update |
Thewolfchild (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
1. Documents prior to 2014 which refer to the verbose phrase of "Her Majesty's Naval Service" [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 15:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC) |
1. Documents prior to 2014 which refer to the verbose phrase of "Her Majesty's Naval Service" [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 15:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
: Oh dear, the editor doesn't know when this occurred either. What a mess [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rob984#Her_Majesty%27s_Naval_Service] [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 23:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC) |
: Oh dear, the editor doesn't know when this occurred either. What a mess [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rob984#Her_Majesty%27s_Naval_Service] [[User:Keith H99|Keith H99]] ([[User talk:Keith H99|talk]]) 23:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
::What does it matter 'when' it came into use? According to the RN, it's in use now.<ref>https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/~/media/files/cnr-pdfs/eligibility_form_online_version.pdf</ref> - <span style="text-shadow:#E05FFF 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">''[[User: Thewolfchild|<sup>the</sup>'''<big><em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF</em></big>'''<small>child</small>]]''</span> 00:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{Reflist talk}} |
|||
== External links modified == |
== External links modified == |
||
Revision as of 00:34, 13 February 2018
| Military history: Maritime / National / British / European C‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Her Majesty's Naval Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050514111544/https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/static/content/209.html to https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/static/content/209.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
History of the term "Her Majesty's Naval Service"
This article uses a reference named "Her Majesty’s Naval Service Eligibility and Guidance Notes" from 2014. It would be good to see the following: 1. Documents prior to 2014 which refer to the verbose phrase of "Her Majesty's Naval Service" Keith H99 (talk) 15:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh dear, the editor doesn't know when this occurred either. What a mess [1] Keith H99 (talk) 23:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- What does it matter 'when' it came into use? According to the RN, it's in use now.[1] - theWOLFchild 00:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
References
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Her Majesty's Naval Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114045213/http://www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regts/the_rifles/rifles_hq/commando_role.htm to http://www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regts/the_rifles/rifles_hq/commando_role.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610015153/http://www.dasa.mod.uk/natstats/ukds/2005/glossary.html to http://www.dasa.mod.uk/natstats/ukds/2005/glossary.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)




