Talk:2017 Women's March: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Jbfair728 (talk | contribs)
NPOV dispute
Line 25: Line 25:


OK, I've lost control of this article. While updating some of the details and logistics about the upcoming Women's March, the user [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] didn't forget to load up the page with political propaganda. --[[User:Jbfair728|Jbfair728]] ([[User talk:Jbfair728|talk]]) 21:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
OK, I've lost control of this article. While updating some of the details and logistics about the upcoming Women's March, the user [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] didn't forget to load up the page with political propaganda. --[[User:Jbfair728|Jbfair728]] ([[User talk:Jbfair728|talk]]) 21:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

:I don't understand...please explain. [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 22:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:57, 27 December 2016

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Vikkibaumler (talk) 19:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC) I will remove the citation to the NY Times article --but thought I was supposed to include it.[reply]

Secondly - this walk will be a historical event that should be captured on Wikipedia for historical reasons.I can remove the Facebook links if that's considered promotional.

How do I go about making those edits? Struggling to figure that out.

vikki Vikkibaumler (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Vikkibaumler (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC) I removed the reference to the NY Times article (which I thought was only a citation) and removed the links to the Facebook event pages -which may have appeared to be promotional. I left the content simply recording what is to be an historic march in political history that deserves a page in Wikipedia for historical purposes.[reply]

VikkiVikkibaumler (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vikkibaumler: The problem is that you have copied word for word an entire paragraph from the NY Times article that was previously linked to. Furthermore, this article contains negative WP:BLP material against Donald Trump without sourcing from reliable third-party sources. Also, there is the problem of Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, because this event hasn't happened yet. The WP:CSD nomination only has to do with the first concern though. With the removal of the promotional Facebook links, the promotional issue isn't really there anymore. I would suggest that you, as a new editor, take a look at some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so that you better understand the concerns that I am expressing here. Thanks, Gluons12 |☕ 20:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

NPOV dispute

OK, I've lost control of this article. While updating some of the details and logistics about the upcoming Women's March, the user Gandydancer didn't forget to load up the page with political propaganda. --Jbfair728 (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand...please explain. Gandydancer (talk) 22:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]