Draft talk:Nintendo Switch 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Toadspike (talk | contribs)
m Toadspike moved page Draft talk:Unnamed Nintendo console to Talk:Nintendo Switch 2 without leaving a redirect: Move to mainspace
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 22: Line 22:


2. no [[Special:Contributions/2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C|2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C]] ([[User talk:2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C|talk]]) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
2. no [[Special:Contributions/2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C|2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C]] ([[User talk:2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C|talk]]) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

== There is a draft we can use ==

The article was reverted to a redirect just now because "we lack any technical details". However, there is an expansive draft at '''[[Draft:Unnamed Nintendo console]]''' that has plenty of reliable citations and technical info that can be used. Should it be moved to this namespace? [[User:SleepDeprivedGinger|SleepDeprivedGinger]] ([[User talk:SleepDeprivedGinger|talk]]) 13:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:23, 16 January 2025

Draft size

@Fantastic Mr. Fox: the new title is more speculative than the old one and does not meet the article titles policy. Futhermore, the lead section is also more speculative, and we need the contrivesses section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:6940:2100:db46:4a53:b9ab:7218 (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a controversies sections and there has never been a controversies section on any video game console article. "Nintendo Switch 2" is not going to be name of the next Nintendo console. I will also point out to you that Draft:Unnamed Nintendo console exists, which I am focused for the foreseeable future. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
we need a contriversies section since it has not been announced yet. 2603:8001:6940:2100:DDE3:2343:5123:690A (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I said, we need a contriversies section since it has not been announced yet. 2603:8001:6940:2100:DDE3:2343:5123:690A (talk) 01:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to add it then, I'm not contributing to this article further. The article won't be published however, because it is WP:TOOSOON and adding a "list" of hypothetical games(WP:CRYSTAL) will result in the article being rejected anyway. You can't even spell "controversies", let alone understand what it means. The word you are looking for is "predicted" or "rumoured specs and games", which Wikipedia is not designed to document. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 08:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3O Response: I'm declining this as premature. The instructions at WP:3 say that the issue need to be thoroughly discussed, and there have only been three comments in this thread. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oops. 2603:8001:6940:2100:DDE3:2343:5123:690A (talk) 01:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies section

Should we add the contriversies section since it has not been announced?

1.yes

or

2. no 2603:8001:6940:2100:8A12:3CB1:B290:409C (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a draft we can use

The article was reverted to a redirect just now because "we lack any technical details". However, there is an expansive draft at Draft:Unnamed Nintendo console that has plenty of reliable citations and technical info that can be used. Should it be moved to this namespace? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 13:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]