The Original Barnstar
	Many thanks. 2022alighasemi (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 2022alighasemi, much appreciated! -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cheetham,

Can you review this page? it's in the draft for few months Draft:Emily_Austin_(journalist)--Static Hash (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Static Hash, sorry, I'm not an WP:AFC reviewer, and as part of my WP:NPP work I tend to mostly just look at scientists/engineers. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A few years ago you rated the Gail Carpenter article as a stub. I recently added some more material and references. I see it at at least C but maybe ready for the B rating. Can you please review that article once again? Thanks! Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jrcrin001, thank you for your message. I'd say it's a solid C at the moment personally. I've just done a bit of tidying up to it, but the "Academic acknowledgements" needs some more work, and I've not looked at the sourcing of the article overall, which is probably the other area that would also need improvement before I'd be looking at classing it as a "B". I'd also be looking for more details on the subject's life, not just her work. More seriously though, you need to make sure you use your own words, as parts of it seem to be copied from copyrighted sources potentially, take a look at https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Gail_Carpenter&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 for the analysis. Also for interest, you don't need to use br HTML tags for a new line on Wikipedia. Hope that helps! -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for removing the catimprove template on Linda M. Morra, I'm not really certain how many cats an article needs before it's considered the normal or acceptable amount. Does that template get an article placed on a list somewhere where the category gnomes dwell? Thanks for your edits to the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ScottishFinnishRadish, I don't think there's a hard and fast rule on it, but I tend to aim for 5 or more for biographical articles. They get added to the list at Category:Articles needing additional categories with that template. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Alexandian award
	Thanks for your efforts to categorise and assess so many articles. I hereby grant you the completely made up award that has an artist's impression of the library of Alexandria in it, because that seems like the sort of thing a librarian would appreciate. I hope you do. CT55555 (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi CT55555. Thank you for that, that's very kind of you! -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another thank you (since I managed to post it first to myself): Hello KJ cheetham--thank you for that clarification. I was thinking that my edit was an explication of the entry, hence my understanding of it as minor. I will keep this in mind. Appreciatively yours Zamboni54 (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zamboni54, thanks for your message. I saw your first reply on your talk page too. I normally watch someone's talk page for 7 days after leaving a message in an effort not to miss things. Do feel free to ask if anything else I can help with in the future though. Keep up the good work. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your welcome message. I had forgotten about signing off with tildes, the reminder is appreciated, thank you. I hope you have an incredibly awesome first of May beautiful day.

MsMisinformation (talk) 09:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC) MsMisinformation.[reply]

Hi MsMisinformation, thank you for message, and I hope you have a great 1st May too! -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham
You've been so helpful before, and I wasn't sure where to direct a request I've received by e-mail. In the page/entry about the British musician and composer, Nick Phoenix, his management has contacted me on behalf of the artist himself, with a sincere wish/request that we edit details in his 'personal life' tab. In 2015 Nick lost his son to a driver, fleeing the police in a stolen car. Phoenix don't mind we mention his son at all. After all his album 'Vanquished' (Two Steps From Hell) was dedicated to his dead son. But, he finds the description too graphical and hurtful. What to do here? Can I accommodate such a wish? Do we need to state the son (Jack) was decapitated in the accident? What is WP's policies about this?
Please advise :) Cheers, Kmilling (talk) 08:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kmilling, I've just been WP:BOLD and removed a few words about it. Given the article is about Nick rather than his son, it doesn't need much detail. If people visiting the article want more detail they can go look at the source which is referenced. I hope this will be okay. Could remove another few words if need be, but I'd be inclined to say his son should be mentioned, given it impacted his work. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kj cheetham, I'll send a reply to Nick Phoenix' people, asking them to give the entry in question another look now. Thank you so much for your help. It gives me great comfort and confidence to know, that there's always someone like you I, as a contributor, can ask :) Have a wonderful day, Kmilling (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]