Hi Having originated and maintained this page for some years. Whilst I understand the logic of changing the page title to Burton, Nettleton, it creates a new ambiguiy because there is Nettleton in Lincolnshire. I would be happier if it were changed to Burton Nettleton, Wiltshire

Best wishes Alc59

Hi Alc59. I'd only moved it as it was requested by someone else. I have no stake in it and wouldn't object to it being reverted. If you'd like it moved back I suggest posting a request at WP:RMTR. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Michelle Singletary, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 02:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please hold off on Welton Taylor for, say, an hour or so? I am adding content, references etc., and the edit conflicts make it harder than it needs to be. Markus Pössel (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully didn't cause too much of an issue in the end. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Kj cheetham - I just spent a couple of hours creating an entry for debut author Namina Forna. I created the entry using my sandbox, and then sent it for review by a Wikipedia admin. Much to my despair, I received a note, that it would take as long as 4 months for the admins to review it. So I was wondering if you know of any ways to speed up that process? I know the author is gaining some heat fast these days, following long interviews in magazines and newspapers on both sides of the Atlantic (e.g. Elle Magazine and The Guardian). Please, let me know what you think, and don't hold back on any advice you can give. - Cheers -- Kmilling (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kmilling! I've just moved it to the preferred location in draftspace at least, but I'll try and take a better look at it later. Unfortunately not a lot can be done to speed it up, as they are done in a fairly random order, and I don't approve AFC articles myself. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else has beaten to me to, and it's since already been approved and edited! -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham - Thanks mate. We'll have to see if someone can help with more citations etc. -- Kmilling (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kmilling, I'm sure more sources will be found in time. The novel is still fairly new, so understandably not many independant reviews of it yet. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham, I would like your candid advice on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheman_Shaik. It has been tagged with Afd for having a low Google Scholar score (h-index 5) and lack of strong notability (though mentioned in two prominent daily news paper in India and UAE), but I believe as a computer scientist and inventor the subject deserves an independent article. There are 6 USPTO patents in computer science application to his credit. Thanks Wisdomwiki 40 (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wisdomwiki 40. I originally tagged the article as a potential notability issue, but looking more closely, the number of papers and citations is far too low to show notability on those grounds under WP:NPROF. I'd normally expect quite a few 1000 citations in computer science on Wikipedia. Six patents is also not a lot by itself, and so would need to show their impact and how they are being used independantly by others to show notability, perhaps in commercial products? Regarding news papers, as per WP:SIGCOV, they need to be significant coverage of the person, not just passing mentions of achievements. At best it might be a case of WP:TOOSOON and need to wait for evidence of notability. Personally, I'd be inclined to !vote delete. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham, FM Global has found evidence of slander against one of our employees on a revision of the official FM Global wikipedia page. I noticed you were the moderator to force a new revision after the action occured and we were hoping you'd be able to remove the revisions entirely? The reason for this is due to DuckDuckGo caching which still displays information from the previous revisions. Could you please remove the following revisions from the "FM Global" Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FM_Global&diff=prev&oldid=992129702 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FM_Global&diff=prev&oldid=992130097 Thank you! 159.221.32.10 (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Zach[reply]

Hi 159.221.32.10, thank you for your message. Unfortunately I'm only an editor and not an administrator, so I'm not able to remove revisions myself. If you look at CAT:REVDEL there should be a list of administrators who can help you though. If that doesn't work, take a look at contacting the oversight team at WP:RFO. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon (where I am), I have noticed that you and I touch a lot of the same pages -- or at least that you often check my work, for which I thank you!

Today I made an edit on the page for Raven Baxter, somewhat reversing a previous edit in which the editor felt Baxter could not be referred to to as a molecular biologist. I laid out my thinking on the talk page. I noticed you had made some edits to her page, previously. If you find you have some time, I would be grateful for your thoughts on my reasoning on the talk page and the wording I put in the opening sentence of her entry.

I am just learning, so I'm trying to do the best I can.

Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 01:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I can be of assistance! It's an interesting question, and I'll reply on the talk page. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please take a look one more time at the article about the musician Ludwik Konopko? Yesterday you have marked it as an orphan article. I connected it to other site and some lists. Does it solve the problem? If yes, could you please remove the orphan tag? If not, I will further work on it. Thank you a lot! Best regards, Msciszewianka (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]