The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:41, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Manning (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable photographer. Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SNG. Sabih omar 17:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Photography, and California. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Authors, and Visual arts. Netherzone (talk) 19:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This advertorial article for a commercial photographer does not meet WP notability criteria for GNG nor WP:NARTIST. It was created by a single purpose editor who has only edited on the subject of Erin Manning. Possibly a PR or COI creation. WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Netherzone (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.